Originally posted by Zeiter
I can just picture it: If we ever ally with the Hive, we can be like:
"What? The Hive and us being enemies? Chairman Yang has always been our friend. What you mistook for anti-Hive sentiments were actually constructive criticisms. You see, the closer allies are, the more secure they feel in sharing constructive criticism with each other. So you see, The Hive has actually been a very good ally for a very long time."
I can just picture it: If we ever ally with the Hive, we can be like:
"What? The Hive and us being enemies? Chairman Yang has always been our friend. What you mistook for anti-Hive sentiments were actually constructive criticisms. You see, the closer allies are, the more secure they feel in sharing constructive criticism with each other. So you see, The Hive has actually been a very good ally for a very long time."
In an article accompanied with this picture no doubt:
We thought that, by getting elections called, we could get all factions of Planet to reunite and hopefully work together towards world peace and success for our human race.
Kassiopeia: “Not any major proposals, but we‘re monitoring the Gaian/Hiverian conflict very closely.
This sentence could for example be changed into a more general :
Kassiopeia: “Not any major proposals, but we‘re monitoring the Hiverian belligerence very closely.
Comment