I updated on 3.9 for that matter, though the latest changes of NZsubheat haven't gone into the map though, since I updated it before he updated his without taking my changes into account.
overall I think that the terrain geography have been worked out more like civ 2 old map in the 4.6 map. I will notice several errors I found with the 3.9 map:
Gobi Desert TOO large, no way it could cover whole central asia!
Mountains in central china???
Desert in Babylon? and the rivers near there?
Thailand Malaysia redone to more fit civ 2 old map. Before Singapore was connected to one of those islands and out of place
Too many mountains in Europe, you don't have Central Europe covered with mountains...
Mountains near Kenya and no plains?
pine wood in England.
non-pinewood in Sweden?
forest in Helsinki area near Finland?
Jungle covering whole of Indochina (Indochina don't have THAT much jungle).
Mountains and hills covering most of Pakistan
All these "errors" have been corrected for more "realistic" choices.
overall I think that the terrain geography have been worked out more like civ 2 old map in the 4.6 map. I will notice several errors I found with the 3.9 map:
Gobi Desert TOO large, no way it could cover whole central asia!
Mountains in central china???
Desert in Babylon? and the rivers near there?
Thailand Malaysia redone to more fit civ 2 old map. Before Singapore was connected to one of those islands and out of place
Too many mountains in Europe, you don't have Central Europe covered with mountains...
Mountains near Kenya and no plains?
pine wood in England.
non-pinewood in Sweden?
forest in Helsinki area near Finland?
Jungle covering whole of Indochina (Indochina don't have THAT much jungle).
Mountains and hills covering most of Pakistan
All these "errors" have been corrected for more "realistic" choices.
Comment