1x1x deity - You Name the World Size and Parameters.
Everything else goes except obvious cheats.
Or
We can play no wonders no barbs. You choose.
I am willing to go either extreme. I just wouldn't want anything that you consider "unbalancing" (BTW - unbalancing = anything that isn't 2x_x king, world size and parameters according to Eyes)
Let's just play something a little different than what you have "pre-programmed" (In a game you don't host, if you don't mind )
How about best of 5 on a random world. I am open to anything that is fair.
You make a suggestion (other than you automatically get HG )
This is at least the 9th different thread over the years that I have challenged you. YOU ALWAYS REFUSE. I guess that speaks for itself.
We have played 2 games in the past. You hosted both. The first was a 2x2x king game. You were in my capital (after a long delay ) in around 3500. The second game was a 2x1x game in which you quit in around 2000 because you didn't like your land. (I guess thats not part of the game ) So I am 1-1 on your settings with you hosting. Care to reciprocate?
THE POINT IS: YOU KEEP REFUSING. In fact, in the past you have asked Ming to remove my posts if I kept challenging you.
I'll let everyone makeup their own mind to the validity of someone who refuses dozens of challenges over numerous years and still claims to be able to win.
But, if you are going to refuse, please come up with something a little new. We are all tired of you refusing because you played "so & so" in the past, or you have written strategies, or I am a rookie, or you could win at 1x1x deity but it takes too long, etc etc etc.
It's obvious from you long-winded posts that you have certainly spent more time ducking this challenge than it would have taken to play it.
By the way, I want to make it very clear that I do not consider myself "the best" 1x1x deity player. Like everything in life, that is an ongoing process. I just think someone who continually makes claims should either back them up or admit that they can't.
But that would probably be too classy for you.
Everything else goes except obvious cheats.
Or
We can play no wonders no barbs. You choose.
I am willing to go either extreme. I just wouldn't want anything that you consider "unbalancing" (BTW - unbalancing = anything that isn't 2x_x king, world size and parameters according to Eyes)
Let's just play something a little different than what you have "pre-programmed" (In a game you don't host, if you don't mind )
How about best of 5 on a random world. I am open to anything that is fair.
You make a suggestion (other than you automatically get HG )
This is at least the 9th different thread over the years that I have challenged you. YOU ALWAYS REFUSE. I guess that speaks for itself.
We have played 2 games in the past. You hosted both. The first was a 2x2x king game. You were in my capital (after a long delay ) in around 3500. The second game was a 2x1x game in which you quit in around 2000 because you didn't like your land. (I guess thats not part of the game ) So I am 1-1 on your settings with you hosting. Care to reciprocate?
THE POINT IS: YOU KEEP REFUSING. In fact, in the past you have asked Ming to remove my posts if I kept challenging you.
I'll let everyone makeup their own mind to the validity of someone who refuses dozens of challenges over numerous years and still claims to be able to win.
But, if you are going to refuse, please come up with something a little new. We are all tired of you refusing because you played "so & so" in the past, or you have written strategies, or I am a rookie, or you could win at 1x1x deity but it takes too long, etc etc etc.
It's obvious from you long-winded posts that you have certainly spent more time ducking this challenge than it would have taken to play it.
By the way, I want to make it very clear that I do not consider myself "the best" 1x1x deity player. Like everything in life, that is an ongoing process. I just think someone who continually makes claims should either back them up or admit that they can't.
But that would probably be too classy for you.
Comment