The Dance of Civilizations [Diplo Game] [Organization Thread Pt1]

[Inca (DoC)]

Peace now when i play the turn.

On vote. 1+3 I vote no. rest are ok i vote yes

[OzzyKP]

Rule 4b has been updated:

4b. When 4 civs have advanced to the next age (ancient, classical, medieval, renaissance, industrial, modern) all techs of the age before the past age can be traded freely without the need to spend vouchers. (If 4 players are in the medieval age, all techs of the ancient age can be traded freely, etc.)

I delayed the effectuation of this rule because of the 2nd possible rule change.

The change this rule brought is that from now on free techs (techs of 2 ages ago) can now be freely traded without any conditions. (you can give them away, sell them for cash, sell them for 1 or more other free techs, etc. etc.)

You delayed it because of the second rule change?

When 24h have past the player just missed his turn. If the 2nd player in the turn order misses his turn he'll be first in the turn order from that moment on.

This?

[Korea (DoC)]

problem bieng my idnety ws made known to all, yours was only made know to aselct group who may or may not use that to thre advantage


hehehehehee

[OzzyKP]

I think a lot of us have a good guess as to who CS is. And a few others. Everyone leaves various tells. None quite so obvious as you of course, Korea.

But of course there are plenty of new people in the game who aren't as easy to spot.

[Korea (DoC)]

ozzy blodoy repsond to me messages.... grrrrr

posted in sotry too,.,

[Robert]

You delayed it because of the second rule change?

Yes, if the players would vote that the top-5 should not be able to receive techs freely, then we should prevent that they would get some missing techs using the vote 1 changes, before the vote 2 application.

[Robert]

problem bieng my idnety ws made known to all, yours was only made know to aselct group who may or may not use that to thre advantage


hehehehehee

And it speaks up for you that you're doing perfect for the past months, so I personally would not even want to apply the penalty on you

[Inca (DoC)]

there is very big diference between player we guess and players who make mistakes from players who accept playing and break rule just that they do not like rule. I know 3 players from mistakes on log in as real name. That is innocent error and I near do it except was blocked by other person from joing.

If rule just be changed at will then why have any rule. same as if player does legal thing turn 50 but rule change on turn 100 makes it illegal thing. Not right punishing that player for breaking rule that is not there on turn 50. Same thing other way round so reason i vote no.

[Robert]

Rule change Vote Status (full vote details here)

Rule 1
yes: 5
no: 1

rule 2
yes:6
no: 0

rule 3
yes: 5
no: 1

rule 4
yes:6
no: 0

rule 5
yes:6
no: 0

[LzPrst]

ozzy blodoy repsond to me messages.... grrrrr

posted in sotry too,.,

ENOUGH!!! I can't take this abuse anymore! As an English teacher in training allow me to point out your spelling which has now become beyond anything possibly unintentional! Are you writing these posts in a panic on a laptop in a car escaping from the police? Are you always late for a space shuttle launch? Or do you just drop down your hands on your keyboard in an uncontrolled diarrhea-inflicted-bowel-like movement?

Basic spellchecking and punctuation is about RESPECT FOR THE READER!

Out of ten words, you've managed to misspell 4. That's more than a third. The use of "me" does not function as "my". I know you Aussies say it, but it's not right to WRITE it! Imagine if everyone wrote with an accent!! We have agreed upon a standard for easy communication. If you are unable to communicate, please, SHUT UP! Since I've asked nicely before and been told that you can't be bothered, I am now telling you not nicely.

[Robert]

Your English is clearly pretty good, LzPrst, but your math skills are definitely terrible
4 out of 6 is 2/3rd (which is indeed more then a third )
But the message consists of 10 words (excluding 'grrrrr').
Out of those 10 words, 5 are misspelled. That's 50%
Not counting the out of place punctuations and missing capitals of course.

---------

Anyway, LzPrst is right, please try a bit to write good English.
It's not a problem to make mistakes, but at least try.

LzPrst, please refrain from posting "SHUT UP" like lines. (6 capitals too much in a 8 characters phrase )

[Korea (DoC)]

mister lizard ,

will do what i can but i make no promises.

life is a rush for me , have way too many things to get done.

if that casues you to not read my posts that is my loss.

thmklyou for putting me in palce once again

[OzzyKP]

Yes, if the players would vote that the top-5 should not be able to receive techs freely, then we should prevent that they would get some missing techs using the vote 1 changes, before the vote 2 application.

That makes sense. But I believe the voters voted down that new rule. So does that mean we can trade freely now?

[Robert]

@Ozzy: yes, I'm sorry. That's what I intended to say with post 2120 but during writing the post I apparently forgot to make that clear

[Mali (DoC)]

well, as a minor nation I have to say that it is serious flaw in this game that there have formed 3-4 large blocs which have existed all game. that the large powers have in effect put their flag on other nations and consider any attack upon them to be attack on themselves. It makes playing a minor nation absolutely pointless. minor nations can do nothing to change their position, as they can't challenge the big nations (shown in the 5 small vs england war, russia vs persia), and they can't fight amongst themselves for land. so we're just tagging along for the ride, but have no hope of making any changes.

And this is different from the real world how? Not everyone can be a super power.