How is the game unbalanced because persia is gone???
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Beyond the Pit [Pitboss Diplomacy Game] [Organization Thread V]
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Pitboss Japan View PostHow is the game unbalanced because persia is gone???
You know why and I said it many times before. It is not imbalance it is injustice. To gift size 20+ cities in well developed land for no effort whatsoever is entirely unfair. It is also a waste as a sub could have been found for Persia but never Korea.
None of it matters now anyway as it cannot be undone.
Comment
-
The game is not unbalanced because Percia is gone, the game is unbalanced because one nation just gobbled up the whole civ for no OOC reason, and no-one bothered to stop them.Ceeforee v0.1 - The Unofficial Civ 4 Editor -= Something no Civ Modder should ever be without =- Last Updated: 27/03/2009
"Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean there's no conspiracy"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pitboss MayaI'm not sure what island you speak of Rome. I didn't notice an island shared by Korea and Rome.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CyberShy View PostJapan did not get entire Piercia.
Piercia consisted of about 7 cities, if I'm correct.
Japan got 4 or 5 and gave away 3 ofhis own cities to others.
Korea is different, I can understand someone being interested just to take part but having seen what they would inherit I cannot imagine anyone being prepared to play a turn every day on the most hopeless of all Civs in the game. Maya/Korea merger is logical and a couple of island cities coming Russia/Rome way is also explicable. Maya will suffer badly short term for those Korean cities and it will be very long term before any real advantage comes her way. I think it probably rules Maya out as part any conflict for a fair while and will hamper her tech for end game conflicts.
But none of it matters now as it was presented as a faite accompli and has now gone far too far to be worth further arguement.
It was still wrong!“Quid latine dictum sit, altum videtur”
- Anon
Comment
-
I only have 5 of their cities and I will be building my new capital in the old persian capital since this is the only way to keep myself out of the hole I put myself in. so to answer you question I have given all I am willing to give and I am a mn of my word so Russia will be getting the settler and two workers with in the next 11 turns.Last edited by Pitboss Japan; March 19, 2009, 18:20.
Comment
-
Persia was big and had potential. The only thing that stopped her development was the fact that her Ruler had rather become disheartened following a previous, unwitnessed by me, defeat had placed her in a cage. She still had hope and was a viable Civ if dynamic leadership had been present. Persia was, relative to her potential, very weak but could have been a lot more.
But let us forget this now!
Comment
-
Ok, only 5 cities. That's indeed what I thought.
Piercia was not really that big, Russia. Their war against Russia had really cripled them.
Even now Russia is still bigger then Japan/Piercia combined.
But thanks for willing to forget and move on!Formerly known as "CyberShy"
Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori
Comment
-
People, don't forget to vote!
We vote for the happenings of February 2009Formerly known as "CyberShy"
Carpe Diem tamen Memento Mori
Comment
Comment