I lost one at 99.9% but then I did do over a 1000 attacks with GG so you'd expect to lose one of these. Which is why i'll be looking more at flanking and tactics.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Noble to Prince - unbearable
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
If you can get AI's to come at you over hills, consider guerilla 3 too ming. This is more of a gunpowder or later thing but guerilla 3 is a 30% hills attack while hills are only a 25% defense boost. The end result is that you have better odds hitting something on a hill than on flat land, and you've got the withdrawl then too. It's a solid way to protect your CR/woodman units.
Comment
-
Thanks... intersting way to look at it.
Why don't we continue this discussion in its own thread:
It certainly deserves it's own thread, and doesn't really fit in with this threads topic
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
ming says thisOriginally posted by rah View Post
yes, I know what you meant and take it as a compliment because I'm still not comfortable at that level (I get beat on that level more than I win) 
And Brandon, take note. Brael is a pro, you are not.
And for the record, go back through this thread and search for the word 'idiot'. You will notice that YOU are the only one that has tossed around this insult. Everyone else has been discussing/questioning your strategies. You claim that some have misunderstood what you've posted. But you've also admitted that your language use is not always that good.
Remember the ole saying. You don't win arguments by calling someone an idiot. It's best if they don't figure that out for a few days. Your mastery of the language isn't good enough for that type of subtlety.
Quote:
But yeah... if you want to play at noble, and build up an awesome defense that doesn't do anything, feel free. That's what the game is all about... doing what you want and having fun. But when you try to tell people that it's the best and most awesome strategy... you better expect some disagreement from other players about that flawed strategy.
note i said i play at prince, he wasnt paying attention
note i said i built up O and D, he wasnt paying attention
note nows hes assuming im telling players how and what to do, pretty much hes assuming my opinions are rules to follow
now hes saying my strategy is flawed even tho he hasnt been paying attention so how could he know?
ming likes to talk outta his @$$
as long as you continue to ignore this fact among many others ive produced, i stand corrected.
Comment
-
then come see me in person and insult me in my face, but since we know you wouldnt, everything you just said explains alot about yourself, your doing and saying whatever you want to further your own ideas/assumptions, your no better than ming. as long as you guys keep attacking, i will never stop, if i get banned i can easily create 10 more names, i will never stop til all you stop prior.Originally posted by Norselord View PostThat's the pot calling the kettle black.
Not impressed with your people skills. Although it doesn't surprise me that an insecure person needs to brag and be a hypocrite as it suits him.
If you don't think I would insult you in person, you are mistaken.
oh and if you live close enough to minnesota, go to the new ulm walmart and come see me in person, im dead serious.
Comment
-
if you think its ok for you to give faulty advice on false assumptions based on yourself and the fact you dont even have enough correct info to be giving advice, then expect this to continue. i gave many many examples of your presumptuous nature and that one post was just one page!Originally posted by Ming View Postbrandon,
You seem to be the one missing the point. I've been discussing civ. They are opinions about the game/strategy.
You on the other hand resort to personal insults, non civ related. I haven't said you should grow up, or implied you have no friends, called you personally an idiot, or many of the other insults you have used.
But I will continue to disagree with your flawed strategies... You keep changing what you say when somebody points out how wrong your approach is...
And if your whole defense is that I said noble instead of prince, that's actually pretty funny.
Prince, noble, it doesn't make much difference. Most of the real experienced players play SP at higher levels, which changes significantly how you have to play the game. Many things that you can accomplish at the lower levels can't be done at the higher levels.
And I will repeat that your current game settings are rigged in the favor of the human and a builder. Again, if that's what floats your boat, fine... that's what custom options are for. But that doesn't change the fact that you've made the game much easier for yourself and the style of play you seem to like. Combine that with the level at which you play, and you pretty much insure yourself an easy game.
Comment
-
Good grief....Originally posted by brandonjm8 View Postthen come see me in person and insult me in my face, but since we know you wouldnt, everything you just said explains alot about yourself, your doing and saying whatever you want to further your own ideas/assumptions, your no better than ming. as long as you guys keep attacking, i will never stop, if i get banned i can easily create 10 more names, i will never stop til all you stop prior.
oh and if you live close enough to minnesota, go to the new ulm walmart and come see me in person, im dead serious.
Comment
-
yeah thats what happens when someone assumes too much then gives advice (in a not great manner btw) based on faulty info, even when i clarified it for him he failed to stop the attack of myself and strategies based on those assumptions. i listed quite a bit of his assumptions and showed just how far off he was, yet he kept at it and i dont see anyone protesting giving faulty advice when your wrong. if i did that to you for example, and kept at it even after you tried correcting me, you'd get very annoyed too. its kinda funny i just proved my point with my post on the prior page of ming's assumptions ect and i see no one protesting such manner here on the forums, if giving your advice based on your own assumptions instead of basing it off of the info giving then i dont want to hear any insults come my way should i do what mings doing to all of you who fail to grasp and acknowledge all the points i made (i could make more points right from here in these forums, the ones i posted were from just ONE page).Originally posted by wodan11 View PostActually, I would think that resorting to name calling is an implicit admission that I have lost ground in the debate and am scrambling to recover. If I have to resort to undermining the other person's credibility rather than simply discussing the merits of the case, then that says something.
Comment
-
Gee... the difference between noble and prince isn't very much, and both are noob levels.
And as far as your counters to my comments, most of it was just backpeddeling to what your originally said. And much of what you said made as little sense as what you orignally posted.
And you can get annoyed all you want when someone disagrees with you, but that's still not an excuse to start with the personal insults.
But again, read the rules/FAQ. It's ok to discuss people's strategy and point out the flaws of their game logic. It is not OK to start with the personal insults.
There is a traditional saying here at Apolyton... one of the most experienced moderators in gaming forum history said it... Attack the posts, not the poster. You might want to remember that
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
if i did that to you for example, and kept at it even after you tried correcting me, you'd get very annoyed too.
one of the most experienced moderators in gaming forum history said it... Attack the posts, not the poster.
I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned
Comment
-
Theben...
I thought you would like that one
And Brandon...
If you came here to join our fine Civ community... then do so! Follow the rules, learn, discuss alternative strategies, provide insights, debate, and have fun.
Our "discussions" do become heated, and there is always a lot of disagreement and different approaches to the same problem... but personal insults aren't a part of it.
But if you all you are going to do is break the rules and personally insult people, you will never really become a member of this community.
Your choice... because the community remains the same either way. You can add to it, or simply be on the outside looking in.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
if YOU think its ok to give advice with faulty info because YOU think it doesnt matter, then im not the last person thats gonna end up disliking you. there is another here named Senethro who doesnt like you either, i wonder if what he has to say about you would be similar to what ive been saying. goes to show you maybe just maybe your methods of advice giving need to be re-thought. and stop patronizing people, you are not better than anybody here. if your word is superior to others simply because of what you think and/or thought you heard then other people may feel the need to call you what they feel on their minds. you will never win, i provided many examples of your false assumptions that you neglected to mentionOriginally posted by Ming View PostGee... the difference between noble and prince isn't very much, and both are noob levels.
And as far as your counters to my comments, most of it was just backpeddeling to what your originally said. And much of what you said made as little sense as what you orignally posted.
And you can get annoyed all you want when someone disagrees with you, but that's still not an excuse to start with the personal insults.
But again, read the rules/FAQ. It's ok to discuss people's strategy and point out the flaws of their game logic. It is not OK to start with the personal insults.
There is a traditional saying here at Apolyton... one of the most experienced moderators in gaming forum history said it... Attack the posts, not the poster. You might want to remember that
oh and i can always go to the next page where i stopped and post that page then another then another, you would see how much you either misunderstood and/or didnt care about since you had already made up your mind. your just as thick-headed as me.
Comment
-
dont be a hypocrite, follow the rules yourself, lead by example. dont mock or patronize people and you wont have to worry about this ever happening, listen to what people say and if they clarify, listen to that too. your making the choice to NOT listen and say whatever you want faulty or not.Originally posted by Ming View PostTheben...
I thought you would like that one
And Brandon...
If you came here to join our fine Civ community... then do so! Follow the rules, learn, discuss alternative strategies, provide insights, debate, and have fun.
Our "discussions" do become heated, and there is always a lot of disagreement and different approaches to the same problem... but personal insults aren't a part of it.
But if you all you are going to do is break the rules and personally insult people, you will never really become a member of this community.
Your choice... because the community remains the same either way. You can add to it, or simply be on the outside looking in.
Comment
Comment