Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which civs/leaders should be in the expansion?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Dutch - Willem van Oranje Org/Fin Special unit: "Geus" (altered musketman) +/+ whatever vs gunpowder unit

    German - Adolf Hitler Agg/Cre (sid was a %^$#@ not to include him) Special unit: "V1" a pre rocket era weapon

    Japan - Nobunaga Agg/Spi Special unit: "Banzai infantry" altered infantry +/+ first strike vs any infantry unit

    USSR - Lenin Org/Ind Special unit: "sniper infantry" (altered reg. infanty) +/+ whatever vs regular infantry unit

    as stated above Churchill something with Spitfire's ??

    Lincoln horse artillery ??

    Vikings yeah! raiders/swordmen ??



    etc etc.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by XGustaX


      Wow this guy even dumber then the last one ! haha yeah thats why Mali and all these random empires are in here please Argentina has done more then the "Malinese Empire" seriously and the Aztecs and Incans haha ya comon they were advanced for Indians but still compare them to Argentina is like Comparing the US to Haiti. Your such a patheic AI (American Igorant)its sad and read up on your history before you say such stupid stuff on this forum ok? Seriously your treating Argentina like if it Nicagua or some 3rd world country please.
      How has Argentina been historically significant? I mean, sure, it's better off than Nicuaragua, but so is say, Canada. Mali was a great center of learning and trade before the discovery of the New World eroded its share of the gold market. The Aztecs and Incas had their own distinct cultures and mighty empires; in fact the aztecs were comparable to a middling European power and would have easily driven off Cortez if they hadn't pissed the other tribes off enough to unite them against them. Does Argentina have a distinct culture? Don't say yes; we all know it is, regardless of fripperies, an offshoot of Spanish culture, just as the US is an offshoot of English culture. The difference is we've done something!

      And before you call me an 'AI', remember that I can at least spell 'pathetic'. And we've still got the nukes.

      Comment


      • #63
        oh he knows all! lol especially since hes American lol look buddy im American to if u noticed by that flag below my name maybe why u cant see i spelled pathetic right lol. ur such a little igorant *****. Seriously you have no clue what your talking about. As everyone clear is dragging on u. your such an American its sad you think we have everything when we really dont. What the hell would you know about Argentina you havnt said one thing to anyone on this forum showing that you do. and yes they do have a VERY distince culture they got more culture then our culturless asses lol which by the way is what everyone else says about us. The Aztecs where a bunch of savages, no one where near even as great to even be in this game. They did not Invent anything new they did not even progress. They were like that for over 1000 years in less then 200 years Argentina has Industrizlied created its own culture and conquered near lands from its near by countries. So dont even come with that Argentina is culturless or is just an off shoot of Spanish culture cuz its not and anyone who knows about it which is obviously NOT YOU, would tell you the same. Who cares about the Aztecs culture or Incan culture seriously as you put it they never did anything Historically great so they had culture lol. oh great Nukes this is the lame ass excuse i hear from little teenage punks.
        Last edited by XGustaX; November 15, 2005, 19:16.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Mayfield
          Either that or Agranemon (The leader of Athens during the Trojan War) Aggresive and Financial.
          That would be Agamemnon




          As to what Civs are missing? Vikings, Zulu, Dutch, Huns, Babylonians
          If I determine the enemy's disposition of forces while I have no percerptible form, I can concentrate my forces while the enemy is fragmented. The pinnacle of military deployment approaches the formless: if it is formless, then even the deepest spy cannot discern it nor the wise make plans against it.
          -Sun Tzu 'The Art Of War'

          Comment


          • #65
            XGustaX, chill and don't flame other people, that's not tolerated on this forum.
            Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
            Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
            I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

            Comment


            • #66
              Then he shouldnt be so rude, Igorant and Complacent.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Hobelhouse


                How has Argentina been historically significant? I mean, sure, it's better off than Nicuaragua, but so is say, Canada. Mali was a great center of learning and trade before the discovery of the New World eroded its share of the gold market. The Aztecs and Incas had their own distinct cultures and mighty empires; in fact the aztecs were comparable to a middling European power and would have easily driven off Cortez if they hadn't pissed the other tribes off enough to unite them against them. Does Argentina have a distinct culture? Don't say yes; we all know it is, regardless of fripperies, an offshoot of Spanish culture, just as the US is an offshoot of English culture. The difference is we've done something!

                And before you call me an 'AI', remember that I can at least spell 'pathetic'. And we've still got the nukes.

                you've seem to be right. Right out of your mind you dont your blabing things you don't even know. For a very long time, even still today, most European immigrants came to Argentina to study and live thanks to the countries wealth. Argentina does have a very distince culture to how thing speak spanish to food to traditions it is the most "European" country of the Americas. Of course with a twist because of the many of ethic groups there are in the country. Argentine traditions and food tend to be a mix of mostly of German, Spanish, Italian, English and Scotish. I would check your sources and not judge countries you know very little about you are giving all us Americans a BAD name.

                PS you have been reported.
                Last edited by Bolobob; November 15, 2005, 19:49.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by XGustaX
                  oh he knows all! lol especially since hes American lol look buddy im American to if u noticed by that flag below my name maybe why u cant see i spelled pathetic right lol. ur such a little igorant *****. Seriously you have no clue what your talking about. As everyone clear is dragging on u. your such an American its sad you think we have everything when we really dont. What the hell would you know about Argentina you havnt said one thing to anyone on this forum showing that you do. and yes they do have a VERY distince culture they got more culture then our culturless asses lol which by the way is what everyone else says about us. The Aztecs where a bunch of savages, no one where near even as great to even be in this game. They did not Invent anything new they did not even progress. They were like that for over 1000 years in less then 200 years Argentina has Industrizlied created its own culture and conquered near lands from its near by countries. So dont even come with that Argentina is culturless or is just an off shoot of Spanish culture cuz its not and anyone who knows about it which is obviously NOT YOU, would tell you the same. Who cares about the Aztecs culture or Incan culture seriously as you put it they never did anything Historically great so they had culture lol. oh great Nukes this is the lame ass excuse i hear from little teenage punks.


                  A coherent counterargument this most definitely is not
                  THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                  AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                  AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                  DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Hebrews - David (Aggressive, Religious), Salomon (Philosophical, Organized)
                    This was EXACTLY what I was thinking. But still, I think there are more worthy civs. You have to remember that if we include civilisations, rather than *peoples*, the Hebrews have not been very significant at all. As a people, Jews have had some impact on history, and if Civ was a game about "peoples" rather than "civilisations", they would have a stronger reason to get in. As it stands, however, we have to disregard about 2000 years of the history of Jews because they have not had what we would call a 'nation' since Biblical times until 1948, when Israel was established. Taking this into account, it would simply be inaccurate to put them in, because as a "civilisation" Jews have not had a very great direct impact on the world. The Hebrews of old were at their greatest for the span of 2 kings, David and Solomon. After that? The entire country broke in half. In modern times, Israel is the regional power in the Middle East, a country filled with corrupt dictatorships. Granted this is pretty good for such a small country, but in the end it isn't surprising given how wasteful and idiotic Israel's neighbours have been towards their own people. In any case I've rambled on about this far too much.
                    "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by XGustaX


                      Wow this guy even dumber then the last one ! haha yeah thats why Mali and all these random empires are in here please Argentina has done more then the "Malinese Empire" seriously and the Aztecs and Incans haha ya comon they were advanced for Indians but still compare them to Argentina is like Comparing the US to Haiti. Your such a pathetic AI (American Igorant)its sad and read up on your history before you say such stupid stuff on this forum ok? Seriously your treating Argentina like if it Nicagua or some 3rd world country please.
                      Argentina? Important?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by XGustaX
                        oh he knows all! lol especially since hes American lol look buddy im American to if u noticed by that flag below my name maybe why u cant see i spelled pathetic right lol. ur such a little igorant *****. Seriously you have no clue what your talking about. As everyone clear is dragging on u. your such an American its sad you think we have everything when we really dont. What the hell would you know about Argentina you havnt said one thing to anyone on this forum showing that you do. and yes they do have a VERY distince culture they got more culture then our culturless asses lol which by the way is what everyone else says about us. The Aztecs where a bunch of savages, no one where near even as great to even be in this game. They did not Invent anything new they did not even progress. They were like that for over 1000 years in less then 200 years Argentina has Industrizlied created its own culture and conquered near lands from its near by countries. So dont even come with that Argentina is culturless or is just an off shoot of Spanish culture cuz its not and anyone who knows about it which is obviously NOT YOU, would tell you the same. Who cares about the Aztecs culture or Incan culture seriously as you put it they never did anything Historically great so they had culture lol. oh great Nukes this is the lame ass excuse i hear from little teenage punks.
                        I never said Argentina was cultureless; I meant the at its ROOTS it was Spanish. I'm really sick of this. Please give a coherent argument on why Argentina should be included that does not involve "Civ X is totally unworthy!" or "Hobelhouse is a moron!"

                        PS: Punctuation and spelling are your friends.

                        Originally posted by Bolobob
                        PS you have been reported.
                        Okay... WTF man? If anyone should be reported it XGustaX.
                        Last edited by Hobelhouse; November 15, 2005, 21:40.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Franklinnoble
                          Vikings: Why they weren't included escapes me. They were always very popular.
                          Depends on who you ask, and when, hurr hurr hurr, but I suppose the main reason we're (scandinavians) not in the game is because although we've all had our Great Days of Yore, we've never really been world powers in the same way as most others. Or we're just too modest.

                          Even the Vikings were never a single nation or tribe, they were just several different tribes of norsemen who kept mostly to their own villages and towns, and did stuff together - the odd hobby conquering and pillaging and so forth, much like some of us enjoy model aircraft in our own spare time.

                          One of the largest Scandinavian empires might have been the Scanian empire, but it was probably not very cohesive or united, more like a loose gathering of baronies... errr, or barbarian villages, if you like. A few hundred years later, the Danish and Swedish empires were occasionally spread over large parts of current Poland, Germany, Russia and Norway, but ... well, we're not a very nationalistic people, so we sort of play that part down a little. For example, you'd rarely hear a Swede admit that our king Charles XII was one of the first in a long line of losers who ever attempted a land war against Russia.


                          Does he belong in a Civ IV Expansion? Probably not. Napoleon represents that cadre of fellows rather well, I think.

                          / Per

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by -FC-Commando
                            Vikings yeah! raiders/swordmen ??
                            Thank you for remembering that my forebears prefered the short sword to axes.

                            And also no horns on the helmets, please.

                            / Per

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Odin


                              Argentina? Important?

                              You have also been reported. And read your history please before you make stupid remarks on things YOU THINK YOU know.This goes to everyone.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Bolobob
                                You have also been reported. And read your history please before you make stupid remarks on things YOU THINK YOU know.This goes to everyone.
                                Can I report frivolous reports?

                                / Per

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X