Originally posted by DrSpike
Well perhaps you would consider developing some judgement about which facts are essential for arguments, and which facts are mere trimming, without affecting the thrust of the argument. It's a difficult skill, and I agree that if you want to bash someone it's always easier to pick out something you can quickly falsify.
Odd though that when you are caught out in factual inaccuracies you are the first to argue that your point remains true regardless.
Well perhaps you would consider developing some judgement about which facts are essential for arguments, and which facts are mere trimming, without affecting the thrust of the argument. It's a difficult skill, and I agree that if you want to bash someone it's always easier to pick out something you can quickly falsify.
Odd though that when you are caught out in factual inaccuracies you are the first to argue that your point remains true regardless.
Comment