Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I wouldn't write off an order of magnitude contribution from OS differences...
edit: also, decline in the gaming market probably won't do much to condense the number of low-end offerings (i.e. integrated graphics), which IIRC constitute a large majority of sales. In fact, the higher-end market collapsing would force game makers to target those more and more.
I wouldn't write off an order of magnitude contribution from OS differences...
edit: also, decline in the gaming market probably won't do much to condense the number of low-end offerings (i.e. integrated graphics), which IIRC constitute a large majority of sales. In fact, the higher-end market collapsing would force game makers to target those more and more.
As someone looking at discrete cards, I find the variety very confusing. Im not sure why having only half the discrete offerings would make me more inclined to keep my IG. I dont think the additional offerings are really marginally really making the experience better vs IG - I think they exist mainly because of the competition between the two vid card manufacturers. When there are fixed cost elements borne elsewhere in the market (as in this case) the additional competition can lead to excess costs. the solution of course is not reducing the number of manufacturers, but the establishment of common standards. Presumably PCGA will address this.
Comment