FG: Galactic Overlord III Signup

[:) Smiley]

To solve the multiple players attacking one target issue:

If 2 people attack one target, they fight together. Each uses its own OoB. The defender's fleet has to split up to fight the two different threats, symmetrically unless otherwise ordered.

If a player completely destroys the part of the defender that is being attacked, that player captures that fraction of the bases. If only a regular victory is achieved, one base is captured.

Example:
Doc and Jam both give orders to attack Rah, but they'e not allied. Rah has 20 ships. 10 fight Doc and 10 fight Jam. Doc manages a small victory, and captures 1 base from Rah. Jam wipes out the other half of Rah's fleet, and takes half his bases.

Allied attacks would still take place as they had before.

[Kuciwalker]

That screws defenders royally.

[Skanky Burns]

I don't see a problem with the original first in last out resolving of battles.

[joncha]

First in, last out is my preference. Otherwise make the combat order completely random.

[Kuciwalker]

FILO

[Ljube]

FILO

[Jamski]

FILO

Its quasi-random anyway (Darn I really, really want to play this time round, but I'm moving sometime this month, so I'll have at least a wek with no c'puter )

-Jam

[duke o' york]

Weighted Average

I am tempted to play again, but really ought to stop playing so many forum games and try to usefully waste my time at work by getting my CV into shape to find a new job.

[DrSpike]

FILO suxxorz.

[Skanky Burns]

LIFO is illegal in Australia for taxation purposes. Which means it pwns.

[duke o' york]

LIFO is illegal here. Are you sure you've got the right one? And FILO is a kind of pastry.

[Skanky Burns]

Yes. I meant LIFO. Which makes sense when you consider that is what everyone else was talking about. I had best edit that post to reflect my original intent.

[Spaced Cowboy]

So are we at a consensus yet?

[GeoModder]

I do hope so!

[Kassiopeia]

I'll consent to just about anything if we'll get to play soon.