Tweet
Sent a test email. We'll see.
-
-
2121 on to sebpYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
turn is now with the morganitesComment
-
Trotsky's turn:Comment
-
turn onward to sebpYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
to drow21Comment
-
drow ??You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
He got it and sent it on.
Trotsky's turn:Comment
-
excellent-- and given that totsky often does not post here, its even money that the turn may be awaiting meOriginally posted by Mid
He got it and sent it on.
Trotsky's turn:
(I can't check from work)
You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Hey... well, that's true.
On a side note - I'll do quite poorly in this game. Not only did I lose an early colony pod, but for some odd reason I chose to explore with my early mobile CPs and built my bases in non rainy tiles, hence my lousy growth.
Trotsky "Impact Fodder" outComment
-
2123 onwardYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Just to be clear-- I'm assuming you mean that you planted your base such that it could not WORK any rainy tiles right? Because the characteristics of the tile you are on are irrelevant to the bases production ( with the exception of specials or rivers)Originally posted by Leon Trotsky
and built my bases in non rainy tiles, hence my lousy growth.
I mention this fact -- which everyone probably knows anyway -- for two reasons
1. I am trying to get more discussion going about smax gebnerally AND
2. This fact is a key difference from CIV2 where building on non-productive land was very bad. In Smax, building your base on the flat/arid tile is the quickest improvement you cabn make to that tiles productivity
I don't believe powergraphs and I always believe people downplaying their position are up to something deeper.Originally posted by Leon Trotsky
Trotsky "Impact Fodder" outYou don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto LuongoComment
-
Yup, that's it.Originally posted by Flubber
Just to be clear-- I'm assuming you mean that you planted your base such that it could not WORK any rainy tiles right? Because the characteristics of the tile you are on are irrelevant to the bases production ( with the exception of specials or rivers)
That's the spirit! Keep it up! I'll try to follow the exaple...Originally posted by Flubber 1. I am trying to get more discussion going about smax gebnerally
The problem I have is that two of my bases don't reach the 2 nutrient surplus any sane player seeks. What was I thinking?Originally posted by Flubber 2. This fact is a key difference from CIV2 where building on non-productive land was very bad. In Smax, building your base on the flat/arid tile is the quickest improvement you cabn make to that tiles productivity
Sure. Like the bottom of the deep green sea.Originally posted by Flubber I don't believe powergraphs and I always believe people downplaying their position are up to something deeper.Comment
-
2123 to drow21.
what sort of discussion do you mean, flubber?Comment
-
Trotsky's turn:Comment
Comment