I'm experiencing this problem also, but not to the extent that rah is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why are the Screens Blown Out?
Collapse
X
-
"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
-
Screen 1024x768 and Moz 1.7.2 but no overlap with this thread but I have had this problem occasionally. Those times, I just minimize the side bar.There's no game in The Sims. It's not a game. It's like watching a tank of goldfishes and feed them occasionally. - Urban Ranger
Comment
-
800x600 is where i have a problem.
When I bump it it's fine, except for the fact that everything is too small. (it sucks getting old)
800x600 used to not be a problem.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rah
IT's not an issue at home. At work we have certain standards that must be maintained.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Comment
-
WinXP Pro & Opera gives this when not full screen (and I almost never do full screen 'coz I like having "peripheral vision" of other things that are open). I had to shrink it some to fit in the 800 pixel maximum size.
I'm not sure how much padding you've specified, but at least the second line doesn't have to wrap at all. If there's a way to make it wrap at the link boundaries instead of at word boundaries that would look better. Sometimes using [alt][0160] for a "hard space" works.(\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
(='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
(")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)
Comment
-
There's another thing I just realized... I thought that attached images used to only affect the width of that one post. But now the entire page is affected.
Oh, and is the proper HTML for a non-breaking space.
Comment
-
(\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
(='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
(")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)
Comment
-
I get this a LOT on 800x600 too and there's nothing obvious doing it.Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21
Comment
-
Ah wait, I'm wrong, there IS something obvious doing it, namely a big image. Basically what Mercator said - bring back the variable-width cells!Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21
Comment
-
Ah, at least the hard space or field padding is fixed!(\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
(='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
(")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)
Comment
-
Whoa! This seems to be a style issue. Even in Opera the entire page would get the same width for me... until I changed to the Default-Special style. Now, only posts with images attached are affected, the rest fits the screen as they should (like in Straybow's screenshot).
So I think this must be a bug, MarkG! Or is there some purpose to this difference?
Comment
Comment