NHL Off-Season Thread 2010

[Ben Kenobi]

You need serious mental help for your pathological lying.

I do hope you charge for those blowjobs.

[Asher]

[Ben Kenobi]

You don't? Wow. I never thought Iggy was a deadbeat too.

[Asher]

You are a crime against humanity.

[Flubber]

Campbell is the real problem, not Huet

$7.140M cap hit & salary through 2014. That's just awful.

Lets just call him a bigger and more long-term problem-- but at least he might play-- althought its hard to see him as the top paid guy on the team

Huet "only" has 2 more years but at 5.6 million thats a lot to pay for a guy to watch the games.

THose two signings though show how the Hawks could have largely survived moderately intact for a while yet-- Lose those 2 players and have 12.5 million more to play with

[Flubber]

I do hope you charge for those blowjobs.

wow Ben-- pathetic-- a new low, even for you

[Ben Kenobi]

Asher's always had a mancrush on Iggy.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Mind if we calm it down in this thread?

[Ben Kenobi]

Sure.

Funny how he can call me a 'pathological liar', and no one blinks.

Double standards anyone?

[Flubber]

Mind if we calm it down in this thread?

Just happening by were you?

I am always calm

[Flubber]

Sure.

Funny how he can call me a 'pathological liar', and no one blinks.

Truth is an absolute defense and you have one of the most dishonest ways of posting I have ever seen anywhere so there is a good argument the label is pretty appropriate

[Ben Kenobi]

Truth is an absolute defense and you have one of the most dishonest ways of posting I have ever seen anywhere so there is a good argument the label is pretty appropriate

Again, a double standard. It's a personal attack whether done by you or Asher.

Glad to see that your standards include attacking people personally and then getting angry when they return the favour.

Keep it clean, I keep it clean. Fight dirty, I return the favour. Your choice, Flubber.

[Flubber]

Again, a double standard. It's a personal attack whether done by you or Asher.

Glad to see that your standards include attacking people personally and then getting angry when they return the favour.

Keep it clean, I keep it clean. Fight dirty, I return the favour. Your choice, Flubber.

All I "attack" is your veracity as a poster. Nothing else. I will comment on it if and when I feel like. If you perceive some need to fight, so be it. I may not notice. I have not gotten angry and I doubt you are capable of angering me. I engage you if you are posting on a topic that interests me generally (like hockey) or if there is amusement in it (your assertion that runners are faster than cyclists).

I will post how I want and when I want including about the content of others posts.

[Ben Kenobi]

All I "attack" is your veracity as a poster.

Then don't act like you are the arbiter of impartiality and get your panties in a twist when I do the same.

[Asher]

It's not an attack, it's a descriptor. If I called you a pathological liar and you were not, in fact, a pathological liar, it would be an attack.

You are demonstrably a pathological liar. Everyone knows it. If you don't like being called a pathological liar, you should consider not being a pathological liar.