Forgive those that trespass? Not in AZ

[zakubandit]

Lorizael something I taught my students about the English language when requesting something, the use of the word demand is not always taken so well. Demanding something of me? Sorry bro, my wife can't even make demands of me. So demand all you want, your better off making requests. As said before, this is the internet and officially you have no authority over me to make any demands. Repercussions for not agreeing to your demands...ban me? ****, I am so frightened. You have to have leverage to make a demand. I have followed Apolyton for a long time as a source of Civ information, I just recently have gotten onto the forums as something to do when I have down time at work.

Section 8 does say the gov can set uniform law for naturalization, what it does not say is that the gov can and will allow foreign nationals to maintain a domicile and lifestyle without proper documentation. Naturalization is the acquisition of citizenship of a nation not of ones birth. Willfully allowing unlawful entry and unlawful settling of non-naturalized persons is not mention, but the term "illegal" pretty much sums up the fact that persons settled inside the borders of the United States without proper documentation are by word of law criminals.

Article VI says that debt from the Confederation are valid to the US, treaties pass are law of the land, judges are bound to those laws, and that you cannot place a test of religion on representatives of the people. So judges are bound to obey the treaties passed by the government, illegal immigrants are to be tried for the crime of illegal entry, failure to produce documents, etc. The oath that representatives of the people take when entering office says they will faithfully discharge the duties of their office, or obey the laws before them and ensure their proper and just pursuit. Illegal entry to the US is illegal by law, and the government is to, by oath of office, ensure their expulsion from within the US borders.

Ask next time *******, maybe you might get a nicer response. And like I said, threat of banning does little to 'shiver me timbers', no one gives a **** but when you get a gun pointed at you in anger a threat of being banned from a website carries so little weight.

[zakubandit]

something weird happened with my network, double post.

And no we are not mandated to have a laize-fairre economy, but government control of the economy, or state property, is socialistic and communistic. Not exactly free country.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Typically that requires an act of Congress rather than executive fiat, no?

Yes, but it depends on the circumstances involved. The auto-bankruptcy involved Congress basically punting to the President on that specific bankrupcy, and since it was in return for federal assistance, I'm guessing there isn't too much of an issue there.

[Lorizael]

I did not say I would ban you, I said that I would declare that you have lost the debate!

Section 8 does say the gov can set uniform law for naturalization, what it does not say is that the gov can and will allow foreign nationals to maintain a domicile and lifestyle without proper documentation. Naturalization is the acquisition of citizenship of a nation not of ones birth. Willfully allowing unlawful entry and unlawful settling of non-naturalized persons is not mention, but the term "illegal" pretty much sums up the fact that persons settled inside the borders of the United States without proper documentation are by word of law criminals.

Rambling about illegal aliens. That's it, you've lost the debate! I have declared it so.

Article VI says that debt from the Confederation are valid to the US, treaties pass are law of the land, judges are bound to those laws, and that you cannot place a test of religion on representatives of the people. So judges are bound to obey the treaties passed by the government, illegal immigrants are to be tried for the crime of illegal entry, failure to produce documents, etc. The oath that representatives of the people take when entering office says they will faithfully discharge the duties of their office, or obey the laws before them and ensure their proper and just pursuit. Illegal entry to the US is illegal by law, and the government is to, by oath of office, ensure their expulsion from within the US borders.

You literally ignored the passage I quoted. Again, that's breaking the supreme law I set forth for your answer. I hereby reaffirm that you have lost the debate!

[KrazyHorse]

Why are you only now declaring something which was self-evident with the fourth post of this thread?

[Lorizael]

Because I'm trying not to usurp the authority of the thread. But sometimes, just like Obama, there comes a time when you have to step in and open up a can of whoopass.

[KrazyHorse]

This thread is proof that the Internets is not for informative but merely entertainment purposes.

[KrazyHorse]

zakubot can't learn, as he's merely a machine, and the rest of us already knew exactly how this bill violates the US Constitution.

What followed the initial post was 12 pages of us inciting him to demonstrate how much of a **** he is proceeded by vicious group teabagging.

The only difference between other people and myself is that I progress to explicit insults more quickly than average.

[SlowwHand]

Plus you're a bigger jackass.

[SlowwHand]

dp

[KrazyHorse]

Nobody cares what you think, slowwie. Other than your fellow ***** DFG and zaku, of course.

Your posts magically appear after mine in multiple threads, so I have to assume that they're some sort of insults directed at me. If you were even an average poly poster I might be afraid that you would score some points while I choose not to read or respond directly. Luckily, you're so incompetent that you're almost certainly only succeeding in making yourself the butt of the joke.

[SlowwHand]

That was certainly scathing.

[Lorizael]

I've also declared that the topic of how much you don't care about who's on your ignore list has become stale, KH. Move on.

[KrazyHorse]

Will you close this thread if I keep discussing it?

Please?

[SlowwHand]

It's not KH's thread to request closing. See how arrogant he is?