Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A gas station

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    OK, I'll try to fool your anti-spam engine once again.


    Originally posted by Elok View Post
    Okey-dokey, I talked with my aerospace engineer friend, and a detail Serb has omitted is that this thing is fairly slow; in addition to irradiating everything it flies over, friend doubts it would go much faster than a passenger jet--possibly significantly slower--and would suffer from poor clixmb performance limiting routes. Detection might be something of a difficulty, but scrambling AWACS is an option and we're talking about something that spends a LONG time in the air. Very low in the air. Personally, I like to think what you're concerned about here is not radar so much as Farmer Brown callicng the authorities about this outlandish contrvivance that just came whooshing along and scared the bejenezus out of his cows. There are a lot of Farmers Brown betwzeen Mexico and DC. That's just my speculations, mind you, not speaking for my friends. It's funny to imagined, though it suck for Farmer Brown since now he has cancer.
    What does your friend tell you about an American-made nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear powered aircraft carriers? Aha?! Surprise!

    Do they irradiate everything too?

    (what an idiots!!!)

    Perhaps the only problem the both of you have is that you are too dumb to understand one could miniaturize a nuclear engine so much to place it into a missile or a torpedoe?
    You, Americans (not to mention your Euro-lackeys) are just too dumb to do so.

    We are not!

    Meanwhile, we have patented an anti-gravitation system for our space station we gonna launch into the orbit in 2027.zzz

    As for the speed of our cruise missile with a nuclear propulsion, than our nuclear powered missile has demonstrated a speed from 900 to 1300 kmph during its test when it flew over 14 000 (fourteen thousand kilometers).

    The Tomahawk missile has a range of 2500 kilometers and a top speed of 880 kmph. 880 kilometers per hour. It's a rusty crap created in the middle of 80's. It's Russian counterpart Calibre flies faster and further.

    But still it is 880 versus 1300!

    Turn on your non-existing brain and give a kick to the ass to your self-proclaimed "rocket scientist"!

    As, for the AWACS, - that is exactly what I was talking about!

    Burevestnik missile flights at 25-100 meters high. That means it flights right over a surface, just like any other cruise missile.

    And if you have ever studied physics you should known that EVERY ground based radar can't see further then 32 kilometers, because the Earth is a ball and radar has a linear beam, while the Earth has a curve.

    So, to detect cruise missiles you should either place ground radars every 32 km of your border and a Patriot battaries nearby or to use AWACS planes (and you have only 31 such planes for the entire World) which flies at 10 000 high and have a detection range of 500 km at best and then you have to be sure to have your fighters nearby to intercept such missile (which is very doubtful, since it is stealthy and even it was not, considering its speed you would have only 1.46 minutes when it will be in your radar zone).

    In any case, the enough quantity of ground radars and SAMS that would worth a TRILLONS OF DOLLARS (which you don't have, because you are a pathetic bunkrupt!!!).

    And exploitation of AWACS and F-35 would WORTH EVEN MORE!

    One hour of AWACS fligh worth 40 000 dollars, one hour of flight of F-36 worth 35 000 dollars (multiply it on two, 'cause one is not enough for a assured kill). Then multiply it on hundreds of AWACS and hundreds of F-35, then multiply it on 24/7/365!

    24*(40 000 + 35 000) = 1 800 000 million a day for a just one pair of AWACS and F-35.

    Now multiply it to 365 days and you will get a 657 millions A YEAR!

    For just a PAIR. A PAIR OF F-35 and a ground based radar!

    Now divide the length of American borderline to the coverage of AWACS radar and amount of F-35 needed to be placed to a nearby airfileds to have a chance to intercept a nuclear powered cruise missile and you would get TRILLIONS a year!

    TRILLIONS you don't have!


    Good luck with your golden condome!​

    You are a technological loosers!

    We are light years ahead of you military.

    Comment


    • #62
      Damn! I didn't fool your censorship engine once again!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Provost Harrison View Post

        Well it is right there Serb, why, what is it you are trying to say? Come now, spit it out...
        I am saying you are the one here who sniffing the fumes.

        Comment


        • #64
          You look pretty high!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Serb View Post

            I am saying you are the one here who sniffing the fumes.
            Explain? Because you're sounding pretty silly at the moment...
            Speaking of Erith:

            "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Serb View Post
              You look pretty high!
              I'm in a supermarket trying on a silly hat for my wife and pulling a face while she takes a photo of me.

              Is it this infallible insight that makes your posts here so coherent?
              Speaking of Erith:

              "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

              Comment


              • #67
                I just don't and never will understand how did you manage to preserve your virginity to your 40.
                That is beyond my understanding.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Serb View Post
                  I just don't and never will understand how did you manage to preserve your virginity to your 40.
                  That is beyond my understanding.
                  40? Again, pulling numbers out of your arse Serb. Considering I've been with my wife since I was 34, she must've made me wait one hell of a long time.
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Ok, 34, not 40!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by BeBMan View Post
                      Also, in other missile news...​
                      This one is for you:


                      Comment


                      • #71
                        And this one too:

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Serb View Post

                          What does your friend tell you about an American-made nuclear-powered submarines and nuclear powered aircraft carriers?

                          Do they irradiate everything too?
                          No. Those operate a closed-cycle liquid-cooled loop. A nuclear rocket will necessarily be open-loop (since the heated gas is what provides the thrust). This is probably readily explained in even Wikipedia, it's not that hard.

                          Originally posted by Serb View Post
                          Meanwhile, we have patented an anti-gravitation system for our space station we gonna launch into the orbit in 2027.
                          lol what?

                          Also, your new space station that will not be permanently creeped <s>because you can't afford it</s> to "lower radiation risk to astronauts" (hmm, why don't you use the super special radiation shielding from the Burevestnik if that's an issue?)

                          Originally posted by Serb View Post
                          As, for AWACS, - that is exactly what I was talking about!
                          You clearly don't know what you're talking about then, since the USA is pivoting it's ISR capabilities to satellites and drones, since it considers large, slow aircraft too vulnerable.

                          Although I guess that when your launch capacity is less than 10% of the US', and decreasing yearly, I understand why you'd want to ignore space. Or maybe you're hoping your new master China will let you hang onto their space industry?
                          Indifference is Bliss

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X