Is it worse for trump to compare his opponents to "vermin" or to all of his opponents to compare him to Adolf Hitler?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Politics Thread
Collapse
X
-
It depends, are there ways that Trump's opponents are acting like vermin or that Trump is acting like Adolf Hitler?
JM
(Have all of Trump's opponents compared him to Adolf Hitler? If so... what does that say about him? )Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geronimo View PostIs it worse for trump to compare his opponents to "vermin" or to all of his opponents to compare him to Adolf Hitler?
The former, because there are people who actually pay attention to his words.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
Comment
-
Republicans are bringing back “trial by combat”!“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
Originally posted by Geronimo View Post
Assange supposedly said this purely through republican congressman Dana Rohrabacher. Normally I might give a congressman the initial benefit of the doubt except that in this case Assange has had plenty of opportunity to corroborate this through his lawyer or subsequent visits by others and so far they all report that Assange swears this is a lie. Hell Assange's lawyer in fact reports that on behalf of Trump, Dana Rohbachrer supposedly offered Assange a presidential pardon from Trump if Assange would claim Russia was uninvolved. He reports Assange rejected the offer.
So this juicy tidbit is totally worthless. Why do you keep giving credence to things that all involved parties are on record as recognizing as false and which, if true, would have had plenty of opportunity to be attested by others?
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...immunity-deal/
"Not included in the written proffer was an additional offer from Assange: He was willing to discuss technical evidence ruling out certain parties in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election. The U.S. government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow.
“Mr. Assange offered to provide technical evidence and discussion regarding who did not engage in the DNC releases,” Waldman told me. “Finally, he offered his technical expertise to the U.S. government to help address what he perceived as clear flaws in security systems that led to the loss of the U.S. cyber weapons program.”
Not many people actually wanted to see his evidence exonerating Russia, but Bill Binney looked into the leak and he's convinced it was a thumb drive taken from the premise and not a hack
Comment
-
Bill Binney spent decades working for the USA becoming one of its top experts in his field but just like that you've turned him into Putin's puppet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View Post"The calls for a cease fire are outrageous" - Mike Johnson Speaker of the House on Israel's bombing of Gaza
Comment
-
He's a raging *******.
The other candidate (yesterday was the runoff between the two top candidates from the first round) was the current minister of economy, which in a country with 140% yearly inflation is hardly a good endorsement.Indifference is Bliss
Comment
Comment