Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[Geronimo]

The one who used Chemical and Bilogical weapons against Vietnam.

You believe that crap about the US using bio-weapons in Vietnam?

The USSR was also accused of using biological weapons. Supposedly, the Soviet Union supplied biological weapons, mainly fungal toxins (Mycotoxins) to government forces, to kill dissident tribal people and enemy soldiers in Laos, Cambodia, and Afghanistan. It was claimed that the US had obtained good evidence that in addition to a traditional lethal chemical agent, three potent Mycotoxins had been used. The evidence came from the analysis of leaf and stem samples from Cambodia which revealed the use of high levels of mycotoxins. The levels detected were up to twenty times greater than any natural outbreak. Between 1979 and 1981 there were a lot more reports of incidents in which fungal toxins were being used against Laotians and Cambodian villagers.

Two major publications on mycotoxin weapons were issued by the US State Department in 1982. The first report referred to 261 separate attacks in Laos in which 6,504 deaths are alleged to have occurred and 124 attacks in Cambodia causing the death of some 981 persons. The second report issued by the US State Department alleged the use of mycotoxins and provided the results of analyses on blood and urine samples obtained from the victims. By analysis of two contaminated Soviet gas masks acquired from Afghanistan the evidence of mycotoxins use was confirmed. Casualties caused by mycotoxins use are not known in Afghanistan.

As for chemical weapons, according to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), this can be any chemical compound intended as a weapon or its precursor that can cause death, injury, temporary incapacitation or sensory irritation through its chemical action. Even by that broad definition agent orange was not a chemical weapon. It was a noxiously dangerous insidious substance, but its harm was incidental to its use not by any stretch the motive or primary effect of its use. The US military routinely exposed its own personal as much Agent orange as they did "the enemy". Not generally how weapons are used eh?

Question for you Serb. Would the truth or falseness of any of these bioweapon or chemical weapon accusations (none of which are confirmed) have any relevance to the defensibility of a massive special operation against Ukraine?

[giblets]

How can I properly adress to a state like USA or Russia (it or she?).

In Russian "Russia" and "America" is a "she", what about USA in English?

Countries don't have a gender in English unless you're engaging in personification.

[Serb]

it's just serb. MWHC has worked next to many russian sailors. it's just serb.

Serb is a typical Russian, so - nope, MWHC!

How is your bunker doing? Is booze room still full?

[Serb]

It seems odd that Russia would spend enormous sums building a pipeline to transport gas to Europe and then blows up that pipeline because it might get sued for not delivering gas to Europe does not sound terribly sensible. This is based on conjecture not evidence.

I do not believe the Russians blew up the pipeline.

Thank you, Captain Obvious!

[Serb]

Serb, from 2014 to February 2022 some 14,000 people are estimated to have died in the war in the Donbass. What fraction of those people do you think died as a result of genocidal attacks targeting civilians?

Absolute majority.

How is the special operation going to be an effective response to that?

It prevented an Ukranian fullscale invasion of Donbass and complete genocide of Russians there.

What would long term success look like?

Look at modern Grozny 25 years after the war.

What if large numbers of civilians in the conquered territories don't like living under Russian rule?

We never cared if they like us or not, as long they don't sream "knife the Moskals, hang the Moskals" as they did at Maidan in 2014 and still doing.
Some things are simply not acceptable.

I never have understood what you think the special operation is any good for.

See above.

[Geronimo]

It seems odd that Russia would spend enormous sums building a pipeline to transport gas to Europe and then blows up that pipeline because it might get sued for not delivering gas to Europe does not sound terribly sensible. This is based on conjecture not evidence.

I do not believe the Russians blew up the pipeline.

The pipeline is not actually destroyed. So long as the repair costs are less than the liabilities, you have motive.

[Egbert]

What don't you like or understand about the reason you quoted from Plato?

It seems odd that Russia would spend enormous sums building a pipeline to transport gas to Europe and then blows up that pipeline because it might get sued for not delivering gas to Europe does not sound terribly sensible. This is based on conjecture not evidence.

I do not believe the Russians blew up the pipeline.

[My Wife Hates CIV]

Is it just Serb, or are Russians just nihilistic in general?

it's just serb. MWHC has worked next to many russian sailors. it's just serb.

[Geronimo]

Serb, from 2014 to February 2022 some 14,000 people are estimated to have died in the war in the Donbass. What fraction of those people do you think died as a result of genocidal attacks targeting civilians and what fraction died as a result of combat between the separatist armed forces and Ukrainian armed forces?

How is the special operation going to be an effective response to that? What would long term success look like? What if large numbers of civilians in the conquered territories don't like living under Russian rule?

I never have understood what you think the special operation is any good for.

[Serb]

Not that your so-called president desides anything!

[Serb]

The modern USA reminds me the late Soviet era - the rule of brainless old farts.

[Serb]

The difficulty is that it was a stupid move no matter who did it.

You have a total age degraded imbecile in charge.

[Serb]

"It is the biggest terrorist state in human history!" - if you care about formal correctness v. casual speech. In the latter case it's okay your way.

How can I properly adress to a state like USA or Russia (it or she?).

In Russian "Russia" and "America" is a "she", what about USA in English?

[Buster Crabbe's Uncle]

"It is the biggest terrorist state in human history!" - if you care about formal correctness v. casual speech. In the latter case it's okay your way, only a little foreign-sounding.

[Serb]

The one who is proven to be guily in overthrowthing dozens and dozens of regimes around the World!