Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[Serb]

Countries don't have a gender in English unless you're engaging in personification.

So, it is "it" in general?

[Dinner]

Yes, they seem to really have been sitting on their butts and waiting until things got very bad before they bothered to act. France was the only one to even modestly start increasing production at the beginning of the war.

[Geronimo]

I can't fathom why Ukraine's allies all thought they could wait until late autumn or even right now to start placing new ammunition production orders. Especially given that every one one of them started off with far less ammunition than their defence plans required for almost anything that might happen.

[pchang]

It's a race to the bottom. Will Russia run out of men before Ukraine runs out of bullets or vice versa?

[Egbert]

When is attempting to make such a distinction actually helpful to explain anything?

could you clarify the difference between observing a possible motive and observing an actual motive?

You are speculating about motives.

I am finished with this conversation.

[BeBMan]

Are people still relying on western sources for information about the war?

Fascinating video: chief Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov explains to a 2008 Moscow theatre audience why war between Russia and Ukraine would be the greatest crime imaginable

[Dinner]

The T-54/55 tanks are mechanically simple and robust. They are very simple to operate compared to Western tanks, and do not require a high level of training or education in their crewmen. The T-54/55 is a relatively small main battle tank, presenting a smaller target for its opponents to hit. The tanks have good mobility thanks to their relatively light weight (which permits easy transport by rail or flatbed truck and allows crossing of lighter bridges), wide tracks (which give lower ground pressure and hence good mobility on soft ground), a good cold-weather start-up system and a snorkel that allows river crossings. In numbers... they can be a force.

Modern tanks ammo will go right through the existing armor on them.

[My Wife Hates CIV]

On the other hand... T-54/55 tanks had their drawbacks. Small size is achieved at the expense of interior space and ergonomics, which causes practical difficulties, as it constrains the physical movements of the crew and slows operation of controls and equipment. This is a common trait of most Soviet tanks and hence height limits were set for certain tank crew positions in the Soviet Army, whereas other armies may not include crew member height limits as standards.

The low turret profile of the tanks prevents them from depressing their main guns by more than 5° since the breech would strike the ceiling when fired, which limits the ability to cover terrain by fire from a hull down position on a reverse slope. As in most tanks of that class/generation, the internal ammunition supply is not shielded, increasing the risk that any enemy penetration of the fighting compartment could cause a catastrophic secondary explosion. The T-54 lacks NBC protection, and a turret basket, which meant that crewmen had to physically rotate and keep up with a rotating turret as the hull in which they stood didn't move with the turret. Additionally, early models also lacked gun stabilization. Most of these problems were corrected in the otherwise largely identical T-55 tank - but not to a level that makes a real difference on the battlefield against western armor.

Even in numbers they can't hold off a superior force.

[My Wife Hates CIV]

The T-54/55 tanks are mechanically simple and robust. They are very simple to operate compared to Western tanks, and do not require a high level of training or education in their crewmen. The T-54/55 is a relatively small main battle tank, presenting a smaller target for its opponents to hit. The tanks have good mobility thanks to their relatively light weight (which permits easy transport by rail or flatbed truck and allows crossing of lighter bridges), wide tracks (which give lower ground pressure and hence good mobility on soft ground), a good cold-weather start-up system and a snorkel that allows river crossings. In numbers... they can be a force.

[Dinner]

Given the all Russian media is state controlled and this filled with lies...

[Dinner]

Modernized T-55's can be somewhat useful, unfortunately for Russia, all the good upgrade packages are made by western countries like Slovakia.

And Russia's tank production relies on electronics and optics sourced from France.

Slovenia was trying to get rid of some T-55s for the last decade or so. Eventually, Germany give them some trucks in exchange for those ancient tanks (modestly upgraded in the 90's) and supposedly gave them to Ukraine.

[pchang]

No. we just accept everything that Serb says as gospel.

[Berzerker]

Are people still relying on western sources for information about the war?

[Broken_Erika]

Modernized T-55's can be somewhat useful, unfortunately for Russia, all the good upgrade packages are made by western countries like Slovakia.

And Russia's tank production relies on electronics and optics sourced from France.

[Dinner]

I have heard the Russians lack the parts and capability to manufacture new tanks in appreciable numbers. That is why T-90s are so rare on the battlefield plus T-90's are just renamed and ever so slightly upgraded T-72s so they are crap anyway. Russia had something like 3200 active duty tanks at the start of the war and the remain 7000 or so reserve tanks were just old tanks parked in a muddy field and left to rust away to pieces. They would be exceedingly lucky if they could revive even half of them after rusting away, exposed to the elements, for 30-50 years depending on how old the model is.

Norway's defense minister recently claimed half of all usable tanks available to Russia have now been destroy or captured. The remaining stock is pretty much all old T-62s and T-55s both of which have been obsolete since the Vietnam era.