Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • N35t0r
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
    if Russia rescued flood victims they'd be accused of a war crime
    Only if they forcibly take them back to Russia.

    They could also stop trying to shell rescue efforts if they are that worried about being accused of war crimes

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    if Russia rescued flood victims they'd be accused of a war crime

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    That was 3 months before Russia retreated from Kherson and started building a new fortified front on the east side of the river. Maybe the dam was a back up plan if Ukraine attacked east from Kherson. Thats about the only motive I can see but it fails too, there was no Ukrainian advance to flood.

    Leave a comment:


  • Broken_Erika
    replied
    There were reports of Russia packing that dam with explosives last august.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Russia's being accused of blowing up a dam that will result in crop failures in territory they control, so why wouldn't Russia blow the dams under Ukrainian control?

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    ​​​​
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

    You said Ukraine would contest the dam and remove the charges - the dam was mined and I said neither side needed the mines to blow the dam (charges = mines). The dams in Ukrainian territory are intact, they have water for crops. Why wouldn't Russia destroy the dams watering Ukrainian territory? Maybe the dam just collapsed, it had been getting damaged during earlier battles. The Russian general withdrew from Kherson because he was worried about the dam. I'm sure he was worried about bridges too, but the bridge over the dam is not near Kherson.
    Because the primary motivation for either party to destroy the dam will be military considerations...not enemy crop failures.​​​​​

    Last edited by Geronimo; June 8, 2023, 23:40. Reason: Spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Lies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Ming View Post



    The Nazis INVADED other countries and tried to take what wasn't theirs.
    Russia is doing the exact same thing. And much of the world has united to stop them.

    The Russian INVASION is not about keeping people from harm. It's a land grab pure and simple. And anybody that gets in their way is a target, including civilians and children.
    They are the ones that started this war by crossing the boarder of another country in an attempt to add the land to their empire.
    Nazis invaded the Donbas for 8 years with US support and Russia defended the victims

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
    No dumbass, the mines I refer to are the ones Russia laid all over along their defenses, which are now washed all over the place. The dam was most probably blown by internally placed explosives (and guess who had control of the dam? Russia)



    Ukrainan special forces were harassing russian troops, but it's impossible for Ukraine to mount a large scale offensive through the river without bridges, and the two crossings (the bridge over the dam and the bridge by kherson) were blown up by the Russians when they retreated from the west bank.


    No, they withdrew from fear of the bridges being blown (one of which crossed over the dam), and thus losing their ability of getting supplies.


    There was more flooding than just the fortifications. There is also videos of Ukrainians rescuing stranded people from the flood.


    There have been major movements of troops from occupied Kherson oblast to the east at least since Wagner was scheduled to withdraw from Bakhmut, but especially since the Ukrainian counterattack against its flanks started; and also to Belgorod since Russian separatists have been wreaking havoc there.



    There was more water released upriver because the river is at it's high in this season. If this had been an extraordinary release on Ukraine's part, then the reservoirs upriver should be lower than expected, instead they are at their annual maximums. The russians should have opened more floodgates to avoid the high level in the reservoir, but didn't.



    How dumb are you? The reservoir also waters 31 different irrigation systems in the Ukraine, supplying water to 5840 km² of Ukrainian cropland (in comparison, Crimea has ~1700 km² of total agricultural land, of which less than 1300 km² is cropland). Around $1.5B of Ukrainian agricultural output is in jeopardy, as well as ~$280M of dead fish and other animals.

    You seriously think that Ukraine would happily inflict all this damage to their own economy, but Russia wouldn't because of crimean crops?
    You said Ukraine would contest the dam and remove the charges - the dam was mined and I said neither side needed the mines to blow the dam (charges = mines). The dams in Ukrainian territory are intact, they have water for crops. Why wouldn't Russia destroy the dams watering Ukrainian territory? Maybe the dam just collapsed, it had been getting damaged during earlier battles. The Russian general withdrew from Kherson because he was worried about the dam. I'm sure he was worried about bridges too, but the bridge over the dam is not near Kherson.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    That is the only part of war Russians are good at. Which makes sense, since they are basically a Kleptocracy.

  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    Trust what you want, but the Guardian is propaganda

  • N35t0r
    replied


    Ukrainians trying to rescue flooded Ukrainians getting shot at by Russian artillery.

    Russians certainly don't seem to care about war crimes...

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    Some interesting thoughts about the dam

    Leave a comment:


  • Ming
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

    The Guardian is propaganda and Nazis have been killing civilians for over 8 years. How many of those civilians were killed by Russia and how many by Ukraine? Strange argument, WWII killed more people than the Nazis so the world should have armed the Nazis instead of stopping them.


    The Nazis INVADED other countries and tried to take what wasn't theirs.
    Russia is doing the exact same thing. And much of the world has united to stop them.

    The Russian INVASION is not about keeping people from harm. It's a land grab pure and simple. And anybody that gets in their way is a target, including civilians and children.
    They are the ones that started this war by crossing the boarder of another country in an attempt to add the land to their empire.

    Leave a comment:


  • N35t0r
    commented on 's reply
    The Guardian is propaganda but we should trust your 'I read somewhere' and 'I saw a video' and 'believe me'? lol
Working...
X