Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

[Dinner]

I see Serb is just repeating all the old debunked Putinist propaganda which has been debunked a million times before. It is sad to see how continually repeating lies works to brainwash a populoupopulous.Serb, you should watch some of the YouTube Channel of Vlad Vexler as well as Inside Russia. Both are run by Russian men, who speak Russian, who lived in Russia, and who are now outside Russia but who are very well informed with interesting observations to share.

[Serb]

Your wet dreams are true for Ukranian conscripts, but not for Russian professionals.

[Serb]

There have been about six barracks hit by Ukraine not one. The Russian military has finally corrected the problem of untrained and poorly equiped mobilized people just being stuck on the Frontline without winter clothing or knowledge of how to survive. Even the corrupt and incompetent Russian officer corp now understands those troops just freeze to death or shortly die so now they are rotating troops on and off the front in 12 hour shifts. That is a good thing as it allows soldiers to have a break, sleep, shower, etc...

The problem is they are massing all of them into one building where they make a juicy target. Ukraine disburses it's forces into small village houses for their off rotation so that destroying one only kills a few troops. Russia is putting 800 into one giant temporary barracks making them tempting targets. This Ukraine is now busy blowing up those barracks and it keeps happening over and over. Yes, Russia's tendancy to put it's ammo stores in or next to the same buildings just makes the problem worse.

You can expect the first six barracks attacks to just be the beginning as it will continue until Russia officers learn to disburse it's forces. The problem is Russian mobilized forces have extremely low moral, they do not want to be there, they are not meaningfully trained, so without an officer forcing them to do things they will just sit there doing nothing other than maybe get drunk. That is why the officers feel they have to mass soldiers just to try to get them functioning as a military unit. That is a damned if you do, damned if you don't choice for the Russian command.

That is your wet dreams, nothing else. Keep watching your TV.

[Dinner]

Not a huge amount but human wave could work if the leadership doesn't care that it is killing the last of their young men.

[Bereta_Eder]

Dinner is a fascist that wants poor people to die

that's why we shoudln;t help ukraine too much

[Dinner]

A single success of yours is a sensation for you, an everyday loosing is unnoticed.
It's the same as like scoring a goal, when you are losing 20:0.

Keep creaming your pants.
But the fact is that we are shelling your puppets and mercenaries with a way higher kill ratio for months.

There have been about six barracks hit by Ukraine not one. The Russian military has finally corrected the problem of untrained and poorly equiped mobilized people just being stuck on the Frontline without winter clothing or knowledge of how to survive. Even the corrupt and incompetent Russian officer corp now understands those troops just freeze to death or shortly die so now they are rotating troops on and off the front in 12 hour shifts. That is a good thing as it allows soldiers to have a break, sleep, shower, etc...

The problem is they are massing all of them into one building where they make a juicy target. Ukraine disburses it's forces into small village houses for their off rotation so that destroying one only kills a few troops. Russia is putting 800 into one giant temporary barracks making them tempting targets. This Ukraine is now busy blowing up those barracks and it keeps happening over and over. Yes, Russia's tendancy to put it's ammo stores in or next to the same buildings just makes the problem worse.

You can expect the first six barracks attacks to just be the beginning as it will continue until Russia officers learn to disburse it's forces. The problem is Russian mobilized forces have extremely low moral, they do not want to be there, they are not meaningfully trained, so without an officer forcing them to do things they will just sit there doing nothing other than maybe get drunk. That is why the officers feel they have to mass soldiers just to try to get them functioning as a military unit. That is a damned if you do, damned if you don't choice for the Russian command.

[Serb]

Wow! That was a lot of answers!

[Serb]

ok, but I always thought he is a Dane. My bad.

[Bereta_Eder]

Cyprus bought the s-300 from russia because US had an embargo on cyprus (US had an embargo on the victim, it lifted it now)

turkey pressured cyprus (with US aid) to give s-300 back to russia


cyrpus gave s-300 to Greece (we stationed it where they can protect the whole agean. we have patriots too)


turkey said Greece shoukd give upo the s-300

we said Molon Labe

now the US wants to give th s-300 to ukraine

however there is an issue of dignity

when russia gacve the s-300 it said it can't be used againsted it

so Greece will not give the s-300 to ukraine

and the right wing fascists will loose power because they wanted to

[Serb]

50 Bradley's is nice but even with the French and German donations we are only talking 150 fighting vehicles plus they are three different platforms. That means parts and maintenance are going to be complicated.

The bell of sense are starting to ring?

[Serb]

It will be even more interesting when Ukraine gets these (if they do):

https://www.thedefensepost.com/2022/...-himars-round/

Like your entire NATO do not supply and train them already.

We will win, PLATO.
That is is simple as 2x2!
No matter your toys or money or mercenaries.

The Russians are always slow at the start, but then drive very fast.

[Serb]

It appears another barracks full of conscripts went boom. You'd think Russia would learn to stop bunching tons of troops up in a single building within strike range of the Ukraine but the Russian command seems to be slow learners.

A single success of yours is a sensation for you, an everyday loosing is unnoticed.
It's the same as like scoring a goal, when you are losing 20:0.

Keep creaming your pants.
But the fact is that we are shelling your puppets and mercenaries with a way higher kill ratio for months.

[Serb]

In Russia, cognitive dissonance is a survival trait.

Says who, again?

You see nothing wrong with the ABSOLUTELY unprovoked wars of agressions the West did against Serbia, Iraq, Aghanistan, Libya, Syria (not to mention Vietnam), where you have killed MILLIONS, but when the Russia finally intervenues to stop the genocide committed by your puppet, by your order - you call that a diabolic act!

So, who has the cognitive dissonance here, a double talking liar?

[Serb]

OMG Serb. No military will make two huge withdrawals from their own national territory like the retreats from Kherson and the Kharkiv region while they are inflicting 10 to 1 losses on an enemy which they enjoy overwhelming firepower and combined arms superiority over regardless of any level of numbers of enemy canon fodder. WTF? Do you ever step back to re-evaluate your beliefs?

Like Kherson and Kharkiv (that we have never a full control of) are the only places where the war takes place!
The width of frontline is over thousands of kilometers, but any local success of Ukrainian forces is portrayed by your media as a decisive victory. Why should I re-evaluate my beliefs, if the grand picture suits them well? It is Ukraine who had lost its territory, population, MIC and economy, despite mobilizing all she could, not Russia.

Think about the situation in Kherson. If 8 waves of mobilization gave the Ukrainians an 8 to 1 numerical advantage while being at large disadvantage in firepower they would either have swarmed the city immediately or if they tried parking outside it, the Russians would have enjoyed an opportunity to decimate the massed enemy troops using their vastly superior firepower.

Did I say we have a firepower advantage at every inch of the front?
We have committed a tactical withdrawal at Kherson, because it was necessary considering the local terrain and the disposition of forces on that exact piece of the front. Period.

What happened was Russia was taking heavier losses there than Ukraine and had more difficulty supplying their forces in the city so they retreated. That scenario is totally incompatible with Kherson being Russian territory let alone being Russian territory where Russia was inflicting 10 to 1 losses on the Ukrainians while enjoying a massive across the board firepower, economic and logistics advantage.

If you didn't notice, the civilian population have been evaquated from the right bank as we wll the the military forces. That was a well organized withdrawal with nearly casualties for the reasons I have mentioned above.

Stop and think hard about what the large Russian retreats mean. It is obvious you never have.

WHAT LARGE RUSSIAN RETREAT?

Two local Ukranian sucsesses is all you got, but that was a long time ago. Today we have regrouped and meatgreanding your puppet at Bakhmut.

We are advancing now, not you!

[Buster Crabbe's Uncle]

He's a Finn.