Vaxxine Rebellion

[Kidlicious]

Dude, it's a Twitter post. It proves absolutely nothing -- except what a Kidiot you are for reposting.

That means nothing. It's hilarious that you think it's significant that it's a tweet. Did Trump's tweets mean nothing? Of course not. This is just a fake defense. Typical.

[-Jrabbit]

What's really hilarious is that I didn't defend anything. In fact, I said the post proved nothing.
But, sadly, you didn't notice. Instead, you assume I'm defending it, so of course, in true Trumpist style, you call it a "fake defense."
Because you literally have no idea WTF you are talking about.

[Kidlicious]

Ah, the "I didn't defend anything" fake defense now. So typical.

[Ming]

He still doesn't get it...

[Kidlicious]

You and JR are NPC memes.

[Ming]

It's simply amazing just how blind the trump sheep are...

[Kidlicious]

3,000 NYC teachers still unvaccinated as mandate takes effect. Let's see how ****ty blue city schools can get.

[Ming]

Let's see how many lives and how much suffering it saves...

[Kidlicious]

Too bad you can't see the lives that are lost and the suffering that results from the ****ty schools.

[Kidlicious]

Remember When Fauci Accused Children Of Spreading AIDS In The 80s And Exposed Patients To Drug Deadlier Than The Disease?




A decade ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci tried to pull the same stunt on the American people that he is currently involved in with the propaganda of the CONvid-1984. In doing so, he was one of the first to point out that children were virtually untouched by the CONvids, only to now be pushing the idea that the shots, fraudulently referred to as “vaccines,” need to be given to everyone. However, do you remember when this criminal actually accused children of spreading AIDS in 1983?



An article was penned by Fauci in May 1983 in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) during the AIDS crisis. In that article, Chicken Little Fauci sounded the alarm about “the possibility that routine close contact, as within a family household, can spread the disease

As Philip Magness reminds us:

The article took an increasingly speculative turn in promoting this new theory. “If indeed the latter is true, then AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension,” it continued. “If we add to this possibility that nonsexual, non-blood-borne transmission is possible, the scope of the syndrome may be enormous.” Although the article reiterated the need to “be cautious” in accepting these findings as they awaited more evidence, the discovery “should at least alert us to the possibility that we are truly dealing with AIDS in children,” as transmitted through routine interaction.

…

We now know of course that Fauci’s theory was wrong. HIV, the virus that was later discovered to cause AIDS, only transmits by exposure to infected bodily fluids such as blood, or by sexual contact. The infant infection discussed in the same JAMA issue involved vertical transmission from the mother to child during pregnancy.

The damage was already done though, as the media went to work stoking alarm about AIDS transmission through simple routine contacts. Hundreds of newspapers disseminated the distressing theory from Fauci’s article. Writing a few weeks later, conservative columnist Pat Buchanan enlisted Fauci as the centerpiece of a rebuttal against Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler, who told him “there is no evidence…that the general population is threatened by [AIDS].”

Magness also said that Fauci was hardly scientific in his comments.

“Fauci usually caveats his remarks with a stream of noncommittal auxiliary verbs – the disease “could,” “might,” or “may” behave as his latest prognostication asserts,” he wrote.

In other words, Fauci has zero evidence for his claims, just theories… hmmm could those be viral conspiracy theories? Yes, that’s exactly what they are but the Mockingbird corporate-owned media ran with headlines that declared Fauci’s word as equivalent to the Word of God, just like they do today.

Margaret Taylor reminds us:

During the 1980s AIDS crisis, Anthony Fauci, a rising star in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) bureaucracy, promoted a false and unscientific hypothesis that children could spread the disease within their families through close contact. According to Great Game India, the media rapidly spread this disinformation, causing a national media frenzy and public hysteria.

On May 6, 1983, Fauci published an article in JAMA Network, the American Medical Association’s monthly open-access medical journal, in which he promulgated this false theory about a newly discovered little-known syndrome.

He also mentioned in that article that the journal had published a study documenting one of the first cases of immunodeficiency disease in an infant in the same issue, increasing “the possibility that routine close contact, such as within a family home, may spread the disease.”

“Researchers conclude the disease can be transmitted by sexual contact and blood transfusions. However, “if non-sexual, non-blood transmission is plausible, the magnitude of the syndrome may be enormous,” Fauci continued, “AIDS takes on a whole new dimension,” fueling confusion and alarm by placing a more theoretical spin on his hypothesis.

The media jumped on Fauci’s claims and took action almost immediately.

Fauci’s hypothesis was deceptive, unsupported, and quickly debunked. It was discovered that the infant infection described in JAMA, on which he based his theory, involved vertical transmission from mother to child during pregnancy. Furthermore, HIV, the virus later connected to the cause of AIDS, is only transmitted through contact with contaminated bodily fluids, such as blood, or through sexual contact, according to medical and scientific consensus.

However, the damage had already been done. Hundreds of newspapers published Fauci’s deceptive hypothesis, and the media vigorously worked to raise awareness about the spread of AIDS through everyday communication.

Fears of transmission by simple touch, which were unfounded, became one of the most damaging blunders of the entire AIDS crisis.

The AIDS crisis was a manufactured one and Fauci not only accused children of spreading AIDS, but also brought in the deadly drug AZT into the AIDS crisis, which was a drug just like the shots given today that killed faster than AIDS did.

According to Celia Farber, “AZT had been an abandoned cancer drug, discarded because of it’s fatal toxicity, resurrected in the cynical belief that AIDS patients were going to die anyway, so trying it out was sort of like playing with the house’s money. Because the drug didn’t require the usual massively expensive research and trial processes, having gone through that years earlier, it was insanely profitable for its maker, Burroughs Wellcome. It was a tragically perfect storm of windfall profits, something to pacify AIDS activists and the media, and a convenient boom to the patent holders for HIV testing.”

If you are not familiar with the entire AIDS scamdemic, check out former CBS Healthwatch reporter Jon Rappoport’s excellent book AIDS, Inc.

Indeed, because the united States has not brought Anthony Fauci to justice for his crimes decades ago, he has been emboldened to commit more against the People. It is far past time that he be brought to justice and given due process and if found guilty, given a swift public execution.

Cross-posted with Sons of Liberty Media

https://conservativefiringline.com/remember-when-fauci-accused-children-of-spreading-aids-in-the-80s-and-exposed-patients-to-drug-deadlier-than-the-disease/

[-Jrabbit]

This article is full of obvious, intentional distortions, and is likely legally actionable.
You should be ashamed to propagate such blatant lies and deliberate smears, Kid.

Also, you pathetic hypocrite, can you explain why you supported HCQ and ivermectin to treat COVID, yet you support prosecuting Fauci for suggesting an FDA-approved cancer drug as a possible hail-mary treatment for AIDS, 38 years ago?

Have any friends who had AIDS in the 80s, Kid? Did you -- as I had to -- watch them die, slowly and painfully, with no cure in sight and Reagan dragging his feels on research funding?

You disgust me, Kidicious. You are subhuman and reprehensible. You are scum.

[Kidlicious]

No. Actually Fauci is exactly what you called me. You're a joke dude.

[Ming]

Too bad you can't see the lives that are lost and the suffering that results from the ****ty schools.

I love how you "ASSUME" that all the ****ty schools are ONLY in blue territory. There are tons of ****ty schools in red territory as well, but as usual, you simple ignore that.

[Kidlicious]

I love how you "ASSUME" that all the ****ty schools are ONLY in blue territory. There are tons of ****ty schools in red territory as well, but as usual, you simple ignore that.

You have a bad reading problem. It's too bad you get all worked up about other things that distract you from your reading proficiency.

[Ming]

At least I actually read stuff, instead of just doing a cut and paste of things from propaganda web sites like you do

[giblets]

How many months will the vaccine rebels spend being unemployed before they finally give in and get vaccinated? Two? Three?

[Kidlicious]

How many months will the vaccine rebels spend being unemployed before they finally give in and get vaccinated? Two? Three?

They haven't even started the federal mandate yet. It might just be a manipulating tactic.

[giblets]

Doesn't mean employers can't require it sooner.

[Kidlicious]

Doesn't mean employers can't require it sooner.

Sure. I don't think it's hard to find a job right now. If you're a nurse or something like that then you might have trouble. I don't know. But if you believe that the vaccine is bad for you you probably aren't going to take it. I know people like that. They aren't taking it.