Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wot no coronavirus thread? Part 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ted Striker
    replied
    Interesting link, says 90% of the expenditures are from chronic ailments (mostly heart disease) and mental health diseases. Prevention can cut down alot of those factors. Sedentary lifestyle, diet, and stress (inflammation) are all items that need an overhaul

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by giblets View Post
    What percentage of the population has cancer?
    Cost of cancer care in the US is about $174bn. The US spends about $3.5tr. Cancer care doesn't represent much of the cost, albeit a slightly outsized cost

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
    Easily. But the pharma and med industries have based their global business models on the current market inequities of the US system (Medicare not allowed to negotiate drug prices, separate pricing for the uninsured, etc), so the changeover would be extremely bumpy.
    I find it quite weird that you don't say anything about the insurance companies - they are probably one of the worst problems you have when exploiting sick people.

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    What percentage of the population has cancer?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Doesn’t something like 50% of US health spending come from 5% of individuals. How skew is taking a mean?

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Easily. But the pharma and med industries have based their global business models on the current market inequities of the US system (Medicare not allowed to negotiate drug prices, separate pricing for the uninsured, etc), so the changeover would be extremely bumpy.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    replied
    If we had a single payer that was allowed to negotiate drug and procedure pricing, we could probably insure everyone and keep the per capita to the current level.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    A better number would be to say 28% of Americans are under-insured/uninsured. Which means that, using our approach, to insure everyone would cost about 16260 per person.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • Ted Striker
    replied


    But that’s Socialism ! ™ Something something extreme left, something something AOC

    Leave a comment:


  • N35t0r
    replied
    Originally posted by giblets View Post
    You can't lead people who refuse to be lead.
    Even with 50% vaccination rate, covid's impact will diminish hugely.

    Of course, long-term prospects hinge on how long immunity lasts, as well as how many people get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ted Striker
    replied
    YouTube Suspends OANN for a Week After It Posted Fake Covid-19 Cure

    https://www.nbcboston.com/news/busin...-cure/2240532/

    Should also be charges for messing with peoples’ lives like that. Literally fake news

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    commented on 's reply
    Ah, but without video - that's why I didn't notice it

  • BeBMan
    replied
    Pchang also posted it a bit ago,

    But I liked it

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    Germans going to war :

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    In a recently resurfaced video clip, Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said Democrats would call off coronavirus restrictions a week after a Joe Biden victory in the presidential election.

    "If it ends up that Biden wins in November...I guarantee you, the week after the election suddenly all those Democratic governors, all those Democratic mayors, will say, 'Everything is magically better. Go back to work, go back to school.' Suddenly, the problems are solved," Cruz said in the July 22 clip.


    Meanwhile, in reality...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X