Should Trump be impeached?

[Ming]

The real embarrassment in this country is the clown sitting in the oval office...

[pchang]

I am also embarrassed by at least one of the clowns who voted the head clown into office.

[Berzerker]

https://youtu.be/wj-wNuKmBrY

https://youtu.be/lE8Hr8jV9dU

Those are Jimmy Dore links

deep state coup with the Democrat's leadership and media

I cant support that... Their guilt disqualifies them to sit in judgement of him, they're worse. I dont blame Trump for asking foreigners to expose their corruption, they've been lying about him for 3 years and it has led to the doorstep of impeachment. I want to know what happened.

Mueller effectively exonerated Trump of the conspiracy and that was the original accusation. He suggested several obstruction possibilities but Trump didn't try to shut down the investigation, he wanted biased or compromised investigators replaced and he had some success. Now its the Democrats turn under the spotlight, sadly I doubt Durham will cover enough ground.

[BeBMan]

It's all about natural rights. The claim isn't that people have the mind of God. It's an argument based on reason. You need to study the principles of John Locke's social contract.

Natural rights 101 with Kid. That doesn't get you anywhere in specific cases. And Locke wasn't even American

[BeBMan]

Senator Lindsey Graham 1999:

Quoted for hilarity

[Kidlicious]

Natural rights 101 with Kid. That doesn't get you anywhere in specific cases. And Locke wasn't even American

I can only try to help you, but you don't want to help yourself.

[rah]

Clinton did commit horrible crimes though, including pressuring young women to lie for him to a grand jury.

And the house passed articles of impeachment for that. Just like they should do now against Trump.

[Kidlicious]

Now they have given up on quid pro quo? That was bait and switch.

[-Jrabbit]

Quid quo pro was never the issue. It's all about the "do me a favor though" ask, and the actual full transcript - conveniently and mysteriously moved to a secret server - likely holds the answer.

Just like "no collusion," this is a fake GOP talking point. It's become their standard strategy -- claim to disprove a something that the Dems never accused them of, then claim innocence of everything (like obstruction with Mueller, which was clearly happening and would definitely have caused impeachment if it had happened under Obama).

How people can continuously buy into the obvious, self-serving hypocrisy is beyond me. It's Kidiocy, I tell you.

[Kidlicious]

That is total nonsense.

[Kidlicious]

The Republicans can call the informant as a witness. This is the stupidest crap ever.

[BeBMan]

I can only try to help you, but you don't want to help yourself.

Keep tryin', maybe you get to a valid point one day that goes beyond vague filo babbling to obfuscate your weak sauce reading of your own constitution...

[rah]

God has interpreted the constitution for Kidiot, he need not really think about it.

[Kidlicious]

So Schiff thinks you can be impeached for coercion of an ally now?

[Kidlicious]

This is the dictionary definition of "coerce...."

co·erce
/kōˈərs/
verb

1. persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.

Ukraine wasn't unwilling. That's insane. What a disaster.

[Dinner]

https://youtu.be/wj-wNuKmBrY

https://youtu.be/lE8Hr8jV9dU

Those are Jimmy Dore links

deep state coup with the Democrat's leadership and media

I cant support that... Their guilt disqualifies them to sit in judgement of him, they're worse. I dont blame Trump for asking foreigners to expose their corruption, they've been lying about him for 3 years and it has led to the doorstep of impeachment. I want to know what happened.

Mueller effectively exonerated Trump of the conspiracy and that was the original accusation. He suggested several obstruction possibilities but Trump didn't try to shut down the investigation, he wanted biased or compromised investigators replaced and he had some success. Now its the Democrats turn under the spotlight, sadly I doubt Durham will cover enough ground.

Mueller specifically said he was not exonerating Trump but that department policy forbids him from bringing formal charges like he did against 16 of Trump’s co-conspirators.

[Berzerker]

Mueller said that about the obstruction charges, he didn't find evidence of conspiracy - the reason for the investigation in the first place

the people who were indicted were brought up on unrelated charges, no one was indicted for conspiracy

[Kidlicious]

The media is still reporting crap on quid pro quo texts.

[Kidlicious]

Mueller specifically said he was not exonerating Trump but that department policy forbids him from bringing formal charges like he did against 16 of Trump’s co-conspirators.