What you don't understand is that the 6% or 8% return on investment isn't given. That depends on world growth and events. With a climate catastrophe, the best return is likely to be very very negative (even worse than the Great Depression and for a continuing duration). Even without a catastrophe, there are solid arguments to be made the the post war (1946 to now) years have been highly abnormal and we are returning to normality where 2% should be usual instead of 6% pr 8%.
JM
JM
Comment