Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thread for obviously newsworthy stuff

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    We'll see what happens. The dems think they are going to win here. It's very risky. They could lose big. They could be done.
    Depends on what winning entails ... winning with regards to preventing Kavanaugh maybe not ...
    wining with regards to making voting for Kavanaugh very costly for the GOP senators (with regards to the midterm elections) ...maybe

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Trump was perfect on this last night in Las Vegas. He just said, "What is going on?!"

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    We'll see what happens. The dems think they are going to win here. It's very risky. They could lose big. They could be done.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    I actually have morals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aeson
    replied
    Some previously unknown woman is getting the better of the entire GOP (headed by Mr. Art of the Deal) in negotiations ... Kid's head asplode!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Of course in reality she is refusing to be questioned by a woman.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

    But you have the right to refuse a hearing by the senate judiciary committee, especially if you think it will be biased crap
    I don't care if she does. The Ds are worried that she won't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    You don't have a right to an FBI investigation.
    But you have the right to refuse a hearing by the senate judiciary committee, especially if you think it will be biased crap

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    You don't have a right to an FBI investigation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post

    Well, what the accuser really wants is an FBI investigation into the case, as she already laid out earlier.
    It should be not surprising that Christine Ford has no interest in a mock public interrogation in which it only is attempted to smear Fords character and not to actually bring light into the truth or untruth of the accusation itself
    No. What she wants is exactly what I said. Idk what your problem is with reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Proteus_MST
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Now the accuser is refusing to prove her accusation and let the accused properly defend himself. This is your freckin **** party liberals.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...urces-say.html
    Well, what the accuser really wants is an FBI investigation into the case, as she already laid out earlier.
    It should be not surprising that Christine Ford has no interest in a mock public interrogation in which it only is attempted to smear Fords character and not to actually bring light into the truth or untruth of the accusation itself

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Now the accuser is refusing to prove her accusation and let the accused properly defend himself. This is your freckin **** party liberals.

    Christine Blasey Ford's legal team has asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to agree to certain terms before she sits down for a potential interview over her accusation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, two sources told Fox News on Thursday night.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Sparky
    replied
    Upstate NY, northern MD, etc. thoughts prayers etc...

    Leave a comment:


  • Giancarlo
    replied
    Kidiot will always be a complete kidiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Thanks for yet another up-to-the-min...SQUIRREL!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X