I missed that alternative reality (I hope it doesn't do irreversible damage to the brain)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vive la France!
Collapse
X
-
That is certainly *one* key factor explaining his win - that ppl did want to prevent LePen.Originally posted by Elok View PostI get the feeling that pretty much all enthusiasm for this man is driven by the sentiment, "Oh God please not that woman."
I wouldn't say that. Even with the point above in mind creating a centrist grass-roots movement that is actually successful in its first election run in a country with classically a more strict left - right divide seems to be something, esp. in times when the extremes are on the rise. He does not seem to care about rather pointless labels a la "left/right", but actually tries to find solutions for the most pressing problems. That could earn him a lot of resistance from both left and right though, so it kinda depends how much ppl are fed up with political deadlock due to the usual partisan games...He appears to want nothing other than the status quo with slight modifications, and nobody especially wants that per se but they're scared that Le Pen would sic stormtroopers on them. Is this accurate?
"Status quo with slight modifications" - that's how he certainly could end up when he fails though. Mainly if he fails to improve the economy/unemplyoment in France then what Dinner wrote - LePen in 5 - is certainly a possibility.Blah
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Pure BS/wet dreams. He was elected on balancing state budget, reducing bureaucracy with 150.000 and get rid of the hopeless rules wrt. hiring/firing workers. He sure has a socialist past, but quit his job as minister since it didn't made sense.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View Postyes
although macron would propably deny it and say he will bring "real reform"
Now if only Greece had a Macron that had the balls to do the same, maybe it could be a prosperous country.
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.
Steven Weinberg
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Shush - adults are posting.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I'm not sure about that. I didn't follow closely enough the whole campaign, but it seemed to me that the bankster label some tried to stick on him wasn't very convincing. Only Mélanchon's supporters swalowed it.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View Postbasically the feeling in france is (I think) **** we have to chose between the bankster oedipus complex wimp and the nazi moron with an IQ of 20. it's the first
By electing Macron, France made the reasonable choice. They managed to avoid both the french Chavez or Tsipras (Mélanchon) and the french Farage or Geert Wilder (Lepen).
Macron might be a vanila, odorless, tasteless, choice, but at least France dodged the communist and the fascist bullets.
I do not expect much of his presidency, except a little bit of common sense. That is if the traditional parties let him do and do not sabotage his decisions. He will have to chose his prime minister with much care.The books that the world calls immoral are the books that show the world its own shame. Oscar Wilde.
Comment
-
Actually, I saw a report that the outcome mostly came down to the rules behind French elections. If France had electoral rules like the US then Le Pen very well might have won. Rules are really important.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View Postof course it depends.
france was never as stupid as the UK or the USA so they made the "right" choice.
this doesn't fix the underlining problems, just gives more time to correct them
macron's only choice is to go back hard to his socialist roots and do a flip flop faster than you can say paine de provence
also with macron merkel's run out of support. now it's only finland and holland and they ain't support. they're peanuts without whiskeyTry http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
The basic argument had to do with the electoral college, how the US has it but France doesn't, and thus candidates fairly regularly lose the popular vote yet win the election due to the E.C..
Macron won big in cities but not in the countryside. Just Trump and Bush in 2000 lost cities but won in the countryside so they won due to the US system. If the US had a French style system Hillary would now be President and we would have had Gore in 2000.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
While that sounds good, you never really know. If the rules were different, strategies might have been different. Money spent in different places. There would be lots of differences. So unless those were the rules used, you really can't say for sure how it would have gone. But in this case, I also lean towards thinking Hillary would have won under different rules.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
Comment