Blood diamonds are illegal to trade, meaning that they are not an example of free trade.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rio Olympics
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostBlood diamonds are illegal to trade, meaning that they are not an example of free trade.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Giancarlo View PostIllegal? In free trade there should be no rules according to the libertarian nonsense it is based on. No regulation. Your statement makes no sense.
Free trade is corporate colonialism.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostNo, they are an example of illegal trade.
Free trade isn't mutually exclusive with regulations.
This is so funny you guys are now splitting hairs. I have had my fun today.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View Postif by "splitting hairs" you mean using the actual definition of free trade, then yes.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Giancarlo View PostFree trade is corporate colonialism.
I guess I can understand now why it's difficult to be having a conversation on free trade when that is your only definition.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostSo that's it? That's your definition of Free trade?
I guess I can understand now why it's difficult to be having a conversation on free trade when that is your only definition.
FREE TRADE.
Free trade causes civil wars and unrest because the locals never see any benefit from it.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostThat's not a definition...
Here it is in more simple terms:
Resource stealing and not helping anyone in the local area.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Oh yes it is.
Free trade = resource stealing.
Yup. A definition!For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
Comment