Originally posted by Dauphin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Great Scottish FREEEEEEEEEDOOOMMMMM!!!!1!!! vote
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Oncle Boris View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThe UK as a whole is poorer than Mississippi.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oncle Boris View PostNothing's gonna happen.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Colon™ View PostConsidering UK's history of non-devolution?
oh, hang on..."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostExcept it is, because they've already all very publicly agreed to it, and not acting would just mean there'd end up being another referendum in about 5 years. Please stop being ridiculous, the UK is a democracy.
I somehow doubt that the Prime minister would give his O.K. again for a referendum (at least not in the next decades) ... and I guess hat also the parliament would be rather not supportive of a referendum, considering how close scotland came to segregating last time
(or with other words ... scotland had its chance and didn´t use it, now it is property of the UK forever )Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"
Comment
-
Well the decision to hold a referendum (or premature elections for that matter) depends on the amount of political pressure the estabishment feels it's getting.
So probably not in 5 years but in the course of time, if there is enough pressure (i.e. more of scotland becomes like the rundown parts of Glascow) there could be a referendum again.
Usually though referendums are being decided by the establishment in the most opportune time that combines two factors I think. First, when the pressure is ready to bust open the cooking pot AND when the chances of a referendum having the result the establishment wants are higher.
Watch as the UK gets various variable geometry clauses from the EU when that referendum takes place (the same as Scotland got, but won't get it, probably :shrugs: )
Comment
-
Originally posted by C0ckney View Postor its history of not kicking constitutional reform into the long grass.
oh, hang on...DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostExcept that's not actually true. They pay way higher taxes than we do, which is what pays for the healthcare and so forth. And poor people do get free healthcare here, it's called medicaid.
2. The way we deal with healthcare in general is tiresome and stupid. I've never heard a clear explanation exactly of why everything sucks here--generally they just say "administrative costs," whatever that means--but it costs too damn much, and a large percentage of my healthcare decisions are not "which option is better for my health?" but "which option will the insanely draconian bureaucracy allow?" Which doctors are covered under my plan? Which treatments are covered? It's all in the fine print somewhere, but often you get bounced between three different offices who give you three different answers. And sometimes office C will just refer you back to office A.
Comment
-
Also, the reason you face so much bureaucracy is twofold:
1. Government rules on what can and can't be covered
2. The fact that healthcare insurance choices are not made by the consumer.
Healthcare insurance is highly competitive. But the customers are not actually the patients. The customers are the employers. Employees don't directly choose their healthcare. If this changed, I guarantee health insurance companies would be more responsive overnight.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment