Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
View Post
If you don't have the constitutional right to smoke pot then the government and congress can regulate it's distribution.
God I hope no one is paying you to teach the Constitution to children, they warned us about people like you. The Framers were not authoring an encyclopedic listing of our rights, they focused on the few they considered most important and vulnerable to a growing tyranny. The Constitution doesn't mention a right to eat food, do you really think that gave Congress the power to ban it?
Originally posted by N35t0r
View Post
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
View Post
Given that the United States has always regulated the distribution of alcohol, this suggests to me that it was the intent of the founders to regulate these things from the very start.
Nobody here is arguing for no regulation. The argument is over how it ought to be regulated. There is no constitutional right to pot.
Nobody here is arguing for no regulation. The argument is over how it ought to be regulated. There is no constitutional right to pot.


Leave a comment: