Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Drunk Drivers' Rights?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sava
    replied
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View Post
    I've got family.
    and you want them to be able to buy OTC oxy?

    Leave a comment:


  • molly bloom
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    Wealth taxes are a hallmark of communism.
    Only Communism ?

    A tax levied at a given rate (specified in the statute) on the value of an individual's movable goods or their income from land (whichever greater). Early subsidies were granted at different rates, often with different thresholds meaning records vary greatly.

    The 1523 and 1543 subsidies had the lowest thresholds, and produced particularly detailed and full lists of taxpayers, large numbers of which survive in E 179. From 1563-1663 thresholds became fixed at a relatively high figure meaning assessments are less extensive but they are a useful source for tracing the fortunes of wealthier citizens.


    Particularly wealthy citizens could also have the dubious pleasure of having to pay a forced loan or benevolence to their sovereign- or be 'indirectly' taxed by having to support their sovereign and the associated retinue while the king or queen was on the Royal tour.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    I have to agree

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    He rarely answers and makes things up frequently. The two main reasons that he is so despised.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    Wealth taxes are a hallmark of communism.
    you didn't answer Sava and you didn't quote me supporting wealth taxes, you just made it up

    Then why are you arguing that the wealth of the Catholic church should be taxed?
    I didn't say it should be taxed, you made that up too...

    Where does the constitution mention the free exercise of toking?
    Same place it says you can read the Bible, the 1st Amendment - religious freedom. Now answer the question, where in the Constitution does it say Congress can control pot?
    Last edited by Berzerker; August 2, 2014, 21:43.

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    Ben please stop whining about paying into SS until you've been responsible for over a quarter of a million dollars in contributions then have to listen to some little douche saying you should just get over it.
    Think you're getting screwed now, just wait.

    What have you paid into the system so far? Based all your posts about that you don't make much money, probably not very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Kenobi
    replied
    They paid into the system, you say the system should steal their money because you're in the system too.
    It's stealing from me, and will collapse before I collect anything. So yeah. If ****ing me over is good enough for me and 'I should just accept it', then they should get ****ed over too.

    Yes, and there is no lockbox
    Then they have no right to collect from me to pay for money they already spent. It's a Ponzi scheme.

    No, where'd I say that?
    Then why are you arguing that the wealth of the Catholic church should be taxed?

    Gee, San Antonio proves the Catholic Church pays property taxes just like the rest of us.
    Again, who would the Catholic church pay to? It was there before the US formed, it was there before the entire city was incorporated.

    your Church has been on welfare for ever.
    LOL The Catholic church predates the US and every city founded in the United States. In many cases, the Church had towns built around it, not the other way around.

    Just stop it, telling us we dont subsidize your Church is insulting.
    The church came first.

    Your job exists because you joined a criminal syndicate that has spent centuries accumulating wealth taken from other people. Voluntary donations my ass!
    Yeah, voluntary donations from parents. Get it through your skull, Berz. I work for a private enterprise. I'll keep pounding it through and maybe it will get through your skull.

    You shouldn't be talking for libertarians or anyone but your self.
    Libertarians do not believe in the zero sum. Communists on the other hand, do. You're parroting Marx here, Berz.

    If the Catholic Church was paying the taxes the rest of us are paying, our rate would come down and it's rate would go up.
    So why not raise property taxes on everyone? This is the zero sum, Berz. Economically, this argument does not work. Taxes are not an independent variable from production. Raise taxes, production goes down. Lower taxes, production goes up.

    This is not rocket science, but it is an inconvenient truth for you.
    I have economics on my side, Berz. All you have is Marxist crap.

    Your Church has been robbing people for centuries, selling them on a scam and torturing and murdering dissenters.
    Wow, Grand wizard indeed.

    Why not?
    Answer the question, Berz. Why 1700 and not 2000?

    You keep confusing rights with powers, now whats that got to do with the subsidies the Church gets?
    The fact that the Church was there first is an argument against the taxation of a pre-existing entity. The state of Texas never owned that land before the Catholic church owned it. Same with the United States as a whole.

    I said I was largely indifferent to Medicare, but people have been paying into the program just like you.
    That doesn't make it right, or sustainable in the long term. When it goes bankrupt what are you going to say? That it was ok?

    some youngster walked up and tried to shut the program down you'd be reacting differently.
    No, I wouldn't I would cheer!

    And most of our taxes are redistributed, at least SS and Medicare will ostensibly pay us back something.
    So you're ok with taxes so long as you get kickbacks? Wow. Turn in your libertarian card, Berz.

    That aint happening
    We have no choice, Berz. There's more of you than there are of us, and we ain't making enough to pay for all of it. You'd have to tax us at 100+ percent to maintain all the promises.

    Which - I suppose might be tried, but it won't happen. We'll all just work off the books.

    , so defend your argument. You claimed the right to decide how everyone lives and you've been trying to change the subject ever since.
    Both programs are dead. Best to kill them off now that wait for a catastrophe later.

    Where does the Constitution mention controlled drugs?
    Where does the constitution mention the free exercise of toking?

    So unless there's a constitutional amendment barring it this makes it ok to engage in illegal behavior? The Feds cant make it illegal without an amendment
    Congress has the right to pass laws unless the constitution explicitly forbears it.

    Thats just one feature of Obamacare
    The law as passed isn't severable. Which means if one part of it is toast, the entire law is toast.

    , the court already said Congress has the power to tax us for health care.
    And it exempts people from the mandate. Obamacare is toast, they can't arrest people for not paying.

    you got a paystub deduction for Medicare gives you the right to make every effing decision about how we live, and you cant understand why I'm giving you ****?
    You can't understand why I'm giving you **** over robbing me and saying, "I'm indifferent to it because I'm collecting off of it?"

    So you are a socialist
    How? I'm the one arguing the constitution takes precedence over the goodie train.

    Considered by people who dont know the meaning of the word
    Wow, now that's a compelling argument. "It's not socialism because I say it ain't". Do I really need to quote some of your libertarian colleagues?

    No it isn't
    Yes, it is. You're gravely misinformed, Berz. Medicare is state run, owned and financed.

    All Congress does is pay the bill just like insurance
    *sigh*. Berz, they collect at gunpoint from everyone and pay out to certain beneficiaries. It's no different than welfare, except that it tends to redistribute from those who are well-off from those who are poor. SS is even worse, it's explicitly designed to take from poor people and pay to the wealthiest subsection of the population.

    I said you cant avoid taxes with that kind of wealth.
    Read your tax laws, yes you can.

    Not without exemptions, and your Church gets exemptions.
    Again read your own tax laws.

    And yet you're the only one here claiming a right to make all of our decisions
    Tax my ass off and I get a say. Don't want me having a say, don't tax my ass off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Kenobi
    replied
    Where does Berz advocate for the dissolution of the private market and the government ownership/takeover of all industries?
    Wealth taxes are a hallmark of communism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View Post
    This may shock you, but I'm in favor of abolishing licensing and certification of every kind in every profession in the United States. Every medication should be available without prescription.
    I agree with that, if we gotta have an FDA they can advise us but not dictate

    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    Exactly what is wrong with that? It's ok if that happens to us. If it's good enough for us, it's good enough for everyone.
    They paid into the system, you say the system should steal their money because you're in the system too.

    Are you arguing that America has a duty to pay out Social security? If so, then they have no need to collect anymore money since it was all in a lockbox somewhere.
    Yes, and there is no lockbox

    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    So you're stating you support wealth taxes?
    No, where'd I say that?

    This is false. Again - I could just as easily argue that the fact people live where they do is because of the Church. Look at SAN Antonio. Is it just a coincidence that it's named after a Saint? In many cases the Church came first, the city later.
    Gee, San Antonio proves the Catholic Church pays property taxes just like the rest of us. That BS Ben, your Church has been on welfare for ever. Just stop it, telling us we dont subsidize your Church is insulting.

    No. My job is sustained by the parents choosing to enroll their children in Catholic school. If tomorrow no parent walked in I would be out of a job.
    Your job exists because you joined a criminal syndicate that has spent centuries accumulating wealth taken from other people. Voluntary donations my ass!

    This does not follow. You're assuming the zero-sum game which is unusual for a libertarian. Taxes are not an independent variable from production.
    You shouldn't be talking for libertarians or anyone but your self. If the Catholic Church was paying the taxes the rest of us are paying, our rate would come down and it's rate would go up. This is not rocket science, but it is an inconvenient truth for you.

    Christ. Study your history! The church received donations from their parishioners. Voluntary donations. In America, the Church predates the state. Especially in Texas, where the gap is some 100 years.
    Your Church has been robbing people for centuries, selling them on a scam and torturing and murdering dissenters.

    Why 1700 and not 2000?
    Why not?

    Does the state have the right to tax land it never owned?
    You keep confusing rights with powers, now whats that got to do with the subsidies the Church gets?

    You're a libertarian and ok with involuntary wealth redistribution? Wow. Says it all, really.
    I said I was largely indifferent to Medicare, but people have been paying into the program just like you. If you spent the next 4 decades paying into it and some youngster walked up and tried to shut the program down you'd be reacting differently. And most of our taxes are redistributed, at least SS and Medicare will ostensibly pay us back something.

    Insofar as I'm being held responsible for paying for their medicine, yes I am. Here's an idea, how about everyone pay for their own stuff?
    That aint happening, so defend your argument. You claimed the right to decide how everyone lives and you've been trying to change the subject ever since.

    It's a controlled drug.
    Where does the Constitution mention controlled drugs?

    So unless there's a constitutional amendment barring it this makes it ok to engage in illegal behavior?
    The Feds cant make it illegal without an amendment

    The court just said in hobby lobby that the mandate is unconstitutional.
    Thats just one feature of Obamacare, the court already said Congress has the power to tax us for health care.

    Then why are you busting my balls over medicare if you believe it's unconstitutional?
    Jesus H Christ, you accused me of taking your money for my Medicare, then you said the fact you got a paystub deduction for Medicare gives you the right to make every effing decision about how we live, and you cant understand why I'm giving you ****?

    Yes, it's what makes these things socialism, yes. The fact that their expenses are bourne by the taxpayer and not the individual.
    So you are a socialist

    Medicare is considered to be socialized medicine. This is not controversial.
    Considered by people who dont know the meaning of the word

    Medicare is state run, owned and operated.
    No it isn't, the providers are private medical staff. All Congress does is pay the bill just like insurance...

    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    Hmm? Berz dodged my question. I asked him since he was arguing that the Catholic church had excessive wealth that should be taxed if he supported wealth taxes.
    I didn't say any of that, I said you cant avoid taxes with that kind of wealth. Not without exemptions, and your Church gets exemptions.

    Personally, he sounds like a straight up communist. Does Pot smoking turn you commie?
    And yet you're the only one here claiming a right to make all of our decisions

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr Strangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by Sava View Post
    why's that?
    I've got family.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sava
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post

    Personally, he sounds like a straight up communist.
    Where does Berz advocate for the dissolution of the private market and the government ownership/takeover of all industries?

    Quote where Berz said that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Kenobi
    replied
    Hmm? Berz dodged my question. I asked him since he was arguing that the Catholic church had excessive wealth that should be taxed if he supported wealth taxes.

    Personally, he sounds like a straight up communist. Does Pot smoking turn you commie?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sava
    replied
    You can start with the reply right before mine.

    First question. Dodged.

    Second question. Your response had nothing to do with what you were responding to....

    i stopped reading after that

    imran kinda wore me out

    you could fail at knowing what the word "that" means at this point and i wouldnt care

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Kenobi
    replied
    Do you answer a question with an irrelevant question because you think people won't notice? As if deflecting somehow means you aren't wrong?
    Is there a specific question that you feel I did not adequately challenge?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sava
    replied
    Do you answer a question with an irrelevant question because you think people won't notice? As if deflecting somehow means you aren't wrong?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X