Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Drunk Drivers' Rights?
Collapse
X
-
Are you seriously arguing that a communist would be opposed to a wealth tax?communists want to abolish private property, not tax it. you can't tax something that doesn't exist. things don't get more basic than this.
Leave a comment:
-
communists want to abolish private property, not tax it. you can't tax something that doesn't exist. things don't get more basic than this.
Leave a comment:
-
Are you seriously arguing that a communist would be opposed to a wealth tax? 4 of the points of the Manifesto involve communist takeover of various ways of earning wealth.somehow wealth taxes and expropriation are exactly the same.
Leave a comment:
-
Your argument, "toking up is a religious practice protected by the 1st."So the 1st Amendment doesn't protect reading the Bible? Your contempt for our religious freedom is duly noted, can I quote you the next time you complain about the government intruding upon yours?
No, it's not. Getting high is not a religion.
And the people do not have the enumerated right to smoke pot.The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
People who believe that smoking pot is a fundamental freedom? They warned us about people like you who would insert whatever the hell they wanted to into the constitution.God I hope no one is paying you to teach the Constitution to children, they warned us about people like you.
Find one who argues that there is a constitutional right to pot.The Framers were not authoring an encyclopedic listing of our rights
Are you arguing that pot is necessary to sustenance in the same way food is? You've got a serious addiction problem if you believe that to be the case., they focused on the few they considered most important and vulnerable to a growing tyranny. The Constitution doesn't mention a right to eat food, do you really think that gave Congress the power to ban it?
I don't believe getting high is a religion. Sorry Berz.But you dont believe in religious freedom, you think its funny when the state jails people for practicing religions you dont like
Taxation is a form of regulation and regulation via taxation involves controls on the distribution. The US has always had controls on importation of quite a number of goods. This is not unconstitutional.You're confusing taxation with regulation
Booze was regulated back then, quite heavily actually.Booze was not regulated back then
Banning!= regulation. Pot is not banned, but it is heavily regulated like most other psychoactive drugs. Are you arguing cocaine should be freely available OTC in supermarkets to whomever?and when the power to ban it was created it took an amendment to the Constitution.
Right, show me a religion where toking is a sacrament. We've used wine for several thousand years now.But Congress did exempt the Church and its members because they used alcohol in their religion. Imagine that, drug use and religion is okay for your Pope and Church... I'm beginning to think hypocrites were Jesus' target audience.
Leave a comment:
-
Arguing that they favor confiscation, isn't going to counter the argument that wealth taxes are at the core of the manifesto.abolishing private property is not the same as taxing it, you imbecile.
Leave a comment:
-
What do you call a history teacher who can't pass his own class?
Does it hurt you that I earned my degree?
Leave a comment:
-
Dr Strangelove is who they based Breaking Bad on.Originally posted by Sava View PostHave you turned over a new leaf?
I was derping around last night reading a lot of archived posts. I'd forgotten how militantly anti-legalization you were. Your discussions with Berz are classic!
Leave a comment:
somehow wealth taxes and expropriation are exactly the same.
Leave a comment: