Tweet
So yeah, I think he bears some responsibility even if it's real little.
But again, it depends on the individual.
But again, it depends on the individual.
-
Why am I not surprised to see Ming and Rah supporting sex with children?Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
"Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION! -
Again I think that the difference between criminal and civil prosecution can account for that.Originally posted by notyoueither View Post
And a 34 with a 15 year old, I'll never think is OK. I'm not thrilled when it's a 34 year old with an 18 year old, (regardless of which one is 34) but that's legal so it must be oK??????
But with another 15 year old. The two might be mature enough for there to be what would be considered consent. At what age difference does it have to be before there's an issue? Are the current legal definitions what they should be. The definitions are different all over the world. Who's right? (it's easy to say some of them are obviously wrong)It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Lying yet again I see... Where did I ever say I support sex with children? Oh that's right, I didn't.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
And yet again, the Supposed College Graduate needs to learn how to read.
In the case (the real case, and not Kid's made up copy and paste from women hate sites) The STATE says they were going for child support because it was consensual sex.
Whether you agree or disagree, it's a fact.
You should learn how to get your facts straight... something you should have learned when you were getting your history degree.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Only in the benverse does trying to discuss the age of consent = supporting sex with children. Go **** yourself. Of course that would be real child abuse.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostIt's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
The case I posted, which you have NO evidence is false, does not say the child did not consent. It doesn't matter. Children should not be sexually taken advantage of. That's sexual violence. Stop trying to cover for this horrible crime against a child. He should not have to pay his rapist child support.Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator RubioComment
-
Then prove it's real besides a simple cut and paste...Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
The people don't exist... There is no court case in the records... It is false. Yet another internet myth.
The HORRIBLE CRIME didn't happen, and HE IS NOT PAYING RAPIST CHILD SUPPORT.
Discuss a real story... and stop lying.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
It's true because I say it is. So, there!
“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of ManComment
-
Gee, it's on the internet... It must be true
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
LA LA LA LA LA! My hands are over my ears! I can't hear you! LA LA LA LA LA!“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of ManComment
-
Did you actually read that? It says some anti men's rights person did a google search and didn't find the sources they like. That's their evidence. It's not evidence at all.Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
The story I posted does not say the boy refused sex. There is no reason to believe it's a lie because this is known to happen. Do you normally think people are lying who say things you know happen?Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Yep... the people don't exist, and there is no record of the court case... no reason at all to believe it's a lie... Do you even listen to yourself?Originally posted by Kidicious View PostKeep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Who looked for a court case? I've already ssked that question twice.Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
And yet again, the source of your internet myth is what?
It took me about 1 minute to find the information that the story was a lie... multiple sites debunked it. People who actually did their own research instead of believing some women hating/bashing web site.
But please... do your own research and see what you come up with.
Bring on real facts.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
Comment