I actually agree with the Afghans on quite a bit. I support their right to keep and bear arms, produce opium, govern themselves as they see fit, and practice their religion as they see fit.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Abortion Thread CCLX
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostNo, it's because real countries are too chicken**** to do anything that would likely getting them facing the Army. Hooah!
If they're afraid of anyone, it's the US Marines. They do the real fighting while the Army is busy driving around the desert, jerking off in their M1s.
Comment
-
Sadly, people like Roger Taney and MtG have no problem denying those rights to some humans. It's hard making the world a better place when evil people are so happy with things as they are.Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostYes, it was. "Creator?"
All "men" but that didn't apply to women or ******s?John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
They have the right to practice their religion, so long as it's Islam. It's sort of like getting a Model T in whatever color you want.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostAfghans don't have the right to practice their religion as they see fit. They didn't under the Taliban, anyway. And I think the right to bear arms is more a function of the inability of any central government to inhibit that.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
Here's the best MBT of Desert Storm. You don't need a gold-plated tank to get the job done when you have real soldiers inside.
Comment
-
Uncle Sam's Misguided Children are like our little brothers in the sandboxOriginally posted by Tupac Shakur View Post
If they're afraid of anyone, it's the US Marines. They do the real fighting while the Army is busy driving around the desert, jerking off in their M1s.
They can do what they want, knowing if things really hit the fan, they have the Army to bail them out.
When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
For it's hi-hi-hey, the army's on it's wayOriginally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostNo, it's because real countries are too chicken**** to do anything that would likely getting them facing the Army. Hooah!
Call out the cadence loud and strong!
For where'er we go, you will always know
That the army goes rolling along!
Comment
-
No ****. The point is that USMC M-60s did just as well in Desert Storm as US Army M-1s. The Marines could've beat the Iraqis on their own and saved the US taxpayer a fair bit of money.Originally posted by regexcellent View PostM60 doesn't have anywhere close to the same kind of shoot and move ability, acceleration, armor, firepower, anything really.
Comment
-
LMFAO, the M60 was a ****ing antique hand-me-down that met antiquated weight limits for the jarheads amphib ops. After Desert Saber, they got the **** rid of them and upgraded to M1s. The ONLY reason the Marines carried the fight into the Kuwait City airport and port area is USAF had been tank plinking for weeks and the Iraqi units in that area were heavily degraded second line units with inferior equipment even by Iraqi standards. You were what, a five year old at the time, if that?Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View PostHere's the best MBT of Desert Storm. You don't need a gold-plated tank to get the job done when you have real soldiers inside.
When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Whatever. Marines are real infantry soldiers. The Army is a bunch of chicken**** artillerymen with an oversized support staff.Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostUncle Sam's Misguided Children are like our little brothers in the sandbox
They can do what they want, knowing if things really hit the fan, they have the Army to bail them out.
Comment
-
Yes, it is true that the combined force of the US Air Force and US Marine Corps kicked the Iraqi Army out of Kuwait while the US Army was dicking around out in the desert. The Army had one ****ing job--close the backdoor on the Iraqis so they couldn't finish running away from the Marines--and they ****ed it up.Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostLMFAO, the M60 was a ****ing antique hand-me-down that met antiquated weight limits for the jarheads amphib ops. After Desert Saber, they got the **** rid of them and upgraded to M1s. The ONLY reason the Marines carried the fight into the Kuwait City airport and port area is USAF had been tank plinking for weeks and the Iraqi units in that area were heavily degraded second line units with inferior equipment even by Iraqi standards. You were what, a five year old at the time, if that?
Comment
-
"Never assume away the capabilities of the enemy" - Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf. M60s would have had a much tougher time against IRG units and incurred significantly more casualties, as well as depending more on tactical aviation support. The M60 didn't "do well" as much as it was placed against heavily weakened opposition so it didn't end up as another of a long line of US tank designs affectionaly known as purple heart boxes.Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View PostNo ****. The point is that USMC M-60s did just as well in Desert Storm as US Army M-1s. The Marines could've beat the Iraqis on their own and saved the US taxpayer a fair bit of money.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
Comment