The limits on magazine size are another one which is widely popular and widely supported.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
[AWB]Dems prep ground for 2014 Electoral Defeat
Collapse
X
-
-
Not among gun owners, who would the ones affected by it.Originally posted by Dinner View PostThe limits on magazine size are another one which is widely popular and widely supported.
And, you know, if it's a "public safety" thing then most firearm homicides use less than 5 bullets, so in that case we might as well go straight to single-shot weapons only.Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.
Comment
-
What did they lie about?That Republicans have had to resort to lying about the bill, just like they did with "the secret death panels", just tells me they know their position is weak and contrary to public opinion.Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.
Comment
-
I believe he was referring to claims that it would create a massive federal gun registry, and that it would criminalize transfers of firearms between family members."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Another glib deflection. WTF does that even mean?Originally posted by Lonestar View PostIt's like the Brady Bunch just give you talking points and you were set loose on the Interwebs.
The NRA is a highly organized group, rated the 3rd most effective political lobbying organization in Washington, with annual income in excess of $200 million. They carry both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) tax exemptions.
What you sneeringly call the "Brady Bunch" is not an organization at all and as such, has no ability to create or disseminate talking points. It is, apparently, just your term for people who disagree with you.
What fixation? My concern is with "criminal acquisition." That's why I weighed in on background checks. I support them. But feel free to focus on the term "assault weaponry" and to denigrate any opinion you disagree with as ill-informed. It's almost as convincing as using "would it have stopped Sandy Hook?" as a litmus test for any and all proposed legislation.Your fixation on "impulsive criminal acquisition of assault weaponry" kinda shows just how little you know about firearms and how most people go about buying them.
Yeah, that's real debating!Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms
Comment
-
Bloomberg, all by himself, has spent $12 million on advertising alone. We don't know what he has spent on lobbying.Originally posted by -Jrabbit View PostAnother glib deflection. WTF does that even mean?
The NRA is a highly organized group, rated the 3rd most effective political lobbying organization in Washington, with annual income in excess of $200 million.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Then why the fixation on gun shows? A 2001 BJS report found that only .8% of inmates were found to have acquired the gun they used in that fashion.Originally posted by -Jrabbit View PostWhat fixation? My concern is with "criminal acquisition."I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
So 10,000 gun murders a year means you'd potentially only save 800 lives a year by fixing it. Clearly not worth bothering with then..Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostThen why the fixation on gun shows? A 2001 BJS report found that only .8% of inmates were found to have acquired the gun they used in that fashion.
Comment
-
Comment