Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[AWB]Dems prep ground for 2014 Electoral Defeat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The limits on magazine size are another one which is widely popular and widely supported.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
      The limits on magazine size are another one which is widely popular and widely supported.
      Not among gun owners, who would the ones affected by it.

      And, you know, if it's a "public safety" thing then most firearm homicides use less than 5 bullets, so in that case we might as well go straight to single-shot weapons only.
      Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

      Comment


      • That Republicans have had to resort to lying about the bill, just like they did with "the secret death panels", just tells me they know their position is weak and contrary to public opinion.
        What did they lie about?
        Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

        Comment


        • I believe he was referring to claims that it would create a massive federal gun registry, and that it would criminalize transfers of firearms between family members.
          "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
          "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Lonestar View Post
            It's like the Brady Bunch just give you talking points and you were set loose on the Interwebs.
            Another glib deflection. WTF does that even mean?

            The NRA is a highly organized group, rated the 3rd most effective political lobbying organization in Washington, with annual income in excess of $200 million. They carry both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) tax exemptions.
            What you sneeringly call the "Brady Bunch" is not an organization at all and as such, has no ability to create or disseminate talking points. It is, apparently, just your term for people who disagree with you.

            Your fixation on "impulsive criminal acquisition of assault weaponry" kinda shows just how little you know about firearms and how most people go about buying them.
            What fixation? My concern is with "criminal acquisition." That's why I weighed in on background checks. I support them. But feel free to focus on the term "assault weaponry" and to denigrate any opinion you disagree with as ill-informed. It's almost as convincing as using "would it have stopped Sandy Hook?" as a litmus test for any and all proposed legislation.

            Yeah, that's real debating!
            Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
            RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dinner View Post
              The limits on magazine size are another one which is widely popular and widely supported.
              Yes, but the support on that side is 'meh' support, not 'outraged' support like on the other side.
              No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
                Another glib deflection. WTF does that even mean?

                The NRA is a highly organized group, rated the 3rd most effective political lobbying organization in Washington, with annual income in excess of $200 million.
                Bloomberg, all by himself, has spent $12 million on advertising alone. We don't know what he has spent on lobbying.
                No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by -Jrabbit View Post
                  What fixation? My concern is with "criminal acquisition."
                  Then why the fixation on gun shows? A 2001 BJS report found that only .8% of inmates were found to have acquired the gun they used in that fashion.
                  I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                  For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                  Comment


                  • So that makes it okay then!
                    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                    Comment


                    • Almost all transactions at gun shows are performed with background checks.

                      Prohibited possessors don't just walk into a gun show and purchase a gun. They send a friend or family member with no record to do it for them. That's illegal and it's called a straw purchase.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
                        Then why the fixation on gun shows? A 2001 BJS report found that only .8% of inmates were found to have acquired the gun they used in that fashion.
                        So 10,000 gun murders a year means you'd potentially only save 800 lives a year by fixing it. Clearly not worth bothering with then..

                        Comment


                        • No, you wouldn't, they'd just buy a gun the easier way: by circumventing background checks with a straw purchase.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                            No, you wouldn't, they'd just buy a gun the easier way: by circumventing background checks with a straw purchase.
                            Sure, criminals will always just find another way to commit crimes, so why bother trying to stop them.

                            Comment


                            • More like, criminals don't obey the law, so passing a law which is eminently unenforceable will not prevent criminals from committing other crimes.

                              Comment


                              • Which is nonsensical as straw purchases would require someone else to help them thus making it much more difficult. Not every criminal has someone willing to risk jail time to help them procure weapons.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X