Originally posted by Donegeal
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Falkland Islanders to hold referendum over sovereignty
Collapse
X
-
Yes, quite unworthy, given that generically claiming the entire earth, known or unknown, occupied or unocuppied, and dividing it between two parties has precisely zero weight in admiralty law, which preceded intenational law.
Not only that, but whatever claim the Argies thought they might have had was extinguished in 1850, by the Arana-Southern Treaty, a fact which the Argies seemed to be well aware of until a little hiccup in 1888, and then didn't raise again, how convenient, until 1941, then promptly forgot.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Not under admiralty law as applied at the time, which is what counts. The common rule was touch and claim, not establish permanent settlement and claim. Modern international law is a lot different, but sorting out a long history of competing claims requires each to be judged in the context of the law which applied at the time.
That's all just the bottom layer of the cake. The icing was the relingquishment of claims by the Argies in 1850. Just because they have seller's remorse because their dumbass strongman of the day couldn't negotiate doesn't mean they get do-overs a century and a half after they screwed the pooch.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Not under admiralty law as applied at the time, which is what counts. The common rule was touch and claim, not establish permanent settlement and claim. Modern international law is a lot different, but sorting out a long history of competing claims requires each to be judged in the context of the law which applied at the time.
Anyway, the obvious counter to this is that the word of GOD was what counted at the time of the Treaty of Tordesillas, thus making the Spanish claim (which predates the British claim by 196 years) completely valid when judged in the context of the law which applied at the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostYou can't steal what's already yours by right and what the thief concedes is yours after you take it back. You trying to impress some hot Argentine mariquita?
Comment
-
i never ****ed an argenina margerita or whatever before
i had jewish, white, black, guatelmela, italian, serbian, bosnian, german, korean, japanese, chinese, filipino, lebanes, southern girl, eghyptan, mexian
what else?
hmm no canadians tho
never met a hot puerto rican... probalyt the unglist latinas
cuban seems intersting
i really wanna brazil
they are nice womenTo us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
MtG, I'm not sure you understand the dynamic Drake is going with here. There are two factors at play: 1) Drake hates the UK, and 2) he's indirectly trolling everyone who believes that the Palestinians should be allowed to kick out the Jews, because the Jews "stole their land".If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostWho cares? The kelpers want to be British.
But the Argie generals got impatient, wanted a domestic win to shore up their rule, tried to speed things up with their invasion and ended up setting back the Argentine cause by maybe another century. In the meantime the Law of Sea convention has come in and given the Falklands an EEZ, making it much more valuable economically. The economic arguments that were driving Britain toward a settlement -the cost of administration - no longer exist.
In Anglo eyes this is typical Latin incompetence. Good one General Galtieri!Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
Comment