Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Student Expelled for Tweet

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
    Allow me to reiterate:



    This is not going to stnad.

    Or even stand.
    Not even if the anti terrorist laws are saying it will be unconstitutional to deny giving that kind of information ?

    You yanks have history of totalitarian state activities, so why not now ?
    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

    Steven Weinberg

    Comment


    • #32
      First off, "anti-terrorist laws" cannot say whether anything is "unconstitutional".

      Secondly, **** you.
      No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
        Not even if the anti terrorist laws are saying it will be unconstitutional to deny giving that kind of information ?
        Err, that doesn't make a lick of sense.
        Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
        "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
          Err, that doesn't make a lick of sense.
          I bet that McCarthy would understand it
          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

          Steven Weinberg

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
            First off, "anti-terrorist laws" cannot say whether anything is "unconstitutional".

            Secondly, **** you.
            No, but politicians can and have
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • #36
              Are you drunk again?
              <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                Are you drunk again?
                Not yet, but working on it
                With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                Steven Weinberg

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                  I bet that McCarthy would understand it
                  You obviously have no idea what McCarthy actually did if you believe there's a parallel here. But given the high odds that you're just a drunk troll, I'm going to stop responding to you.
                  Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                  "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
                    You obviously have no idea what McCarthy actually did if you believe there's a parallel here. But given the high odds that you're just a drunk troll, I'm going to stop responding to you.
                    Ouch. I gladly admit that I have been trolling in the past and will do such in the future, but I actually didn't had that in mind here. It seems like I have been like a dentist drilling in a sore tooth without sedation .

                    Though, I really don't care much if you USanians doesn't like what I write - I write about how it looks from here (i.e. outside US) and it isn't my problem if you don't like it.
                    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                    Steven Weinberg

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I will try to muster more appreciation for the highly important Drunk Dane demographic
                      <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Don't you guys still have a monarchy or something? What the **** is up with that? Now you might not care what an American thinks of your retarded system of government, but I'm just reporting on the facts as an American sees them (which is of course the only correct way to see them)
                        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                          Don't you guys still have a monarchy or something? What the **** is up with that?
                          Sure, we do have a monarchy. Though, it's more like the german presidency. It doesn't really matter a bit but is more a question about head of state.

                          Now you might not care what an American thinks of your retarded system of government, but I'm just reporting on the facts as an American sees them (which is of course the only correct way to see them)
                          That is not true - I'm quite curious about what other people think about our way of organising government. I know that it isn't perfect, but likewise I also know that the alternatives such as the "american way" neither are.
                          With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                          Steven Weinberg

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                            You yanks have history of totalitarian state activities, so why not now ?
                            What is inaccurate about this? The communist witchhunts were a perfect example, and the more recent warrentless wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, state sponsored torture and of course the NDAA allowing the detaining of US citizens without charge.

                            This doesnt mean that other countries don't also have ****ty political systems, but trying to claim the US hasn't acted in a rather totalitarian way on numerous occasions is laughable.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
                              Not even if the anti terrorist laws are saying it will be unconstitutional to deny giving that kind of information ?
                              Kentonio: My issue was with the above statement alone, as it literally makes no sense. I won't attempt to defend America's past actions.
                              Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                              "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Ah fair play.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X