Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Azerbaijan allegedly gives Israel access to airbases

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View Post
    If Israeli jets struck Iran from Azerbaijan you don't think the Iranians wouldn't hit Azerbaijan back, or even invade? That would certainly involve the Russians, who might be happy for an excuse to bring Azerbaijan back into the old fold. Come to think of it, could Azerbaijan make a deal with the Israelis without Moscow approval?
    I don't know. That's an interesting thought. If this is all true (and I don't see a strong reason to believe otherwise, certainly not the Azeri denial), then Azerbaijan has clearly made the calculation that the risk of a nuclear Iran is worth the ensuing geopolitical fallout.

    And yes Israel has planes capable of dropping bunker busters.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
      Yes, but it would devastate them to do it.

      Still waiting on those LCS minesweeper modules...

      If they are crazy enough to do that then it is even more important not to trust them with nuclear capability.
      Why risk it right now? My preferred course of action is to use the carrot & the stick on both Iran and Israel. Let sanctions and negotiations continue, if Iran doesn't respond how we like sell/give Israel bunker busters as a way to make the Iranian regime more worried. Don't let Israeli hawks push things to war before we want though and if hawks in Israel get to out of hand lean on Azerbijian to get them to deny the airfield to Israel, we can make it worth their while to listen to us, and hold off on selling them deep penetrators until we feel it is in our interests to do so (I.E. maybe in another year after we've given sanctions and negotiations a chance).

      That's a logical step by step process instead of jumping straight to a larger war for no good reason.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
        Interesting thought on the nuclear bunker busters.

        The main concern I have with the leak from the US perspective is that it will encourage the Israelis never to tell us anything again, or any of our allies for that matter. It's a huge betrayal against an ally, and when you betray an ally as close as Israel, it makes everyone else nervous.

        Plus, it could have serious repercussions for Azerbaijan, which we don't want.
        The hard unavoidable truth is Israel absolutely without question NEEDS the US, it can't survive long term without US support in the UN and with aid. They're not going to "cut" the US off because that would be biting the hand which feeds them and protects them. They may not like it but they're going to have to police their own hot heads and fall in line on this issue. That doesn't mean we might let them off the leash at some future date but first they're going to need us to sell them deep penetrators and to at least not work to block their access to airfields in 3rd party countries. We control the cards here, not them, and no it's not in our interests to let them wag the dog at this moment.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
          If Obama is willing to pre-emptively skewer Israel's contingency plans then surely he is able to deny an Israeli call for aid.

          That said, a war in which he provides assistance to Israel would probably dramatically boost his poll numbers...
          You mean his current 11 point lead over Romney isn't enough?

          I'm an Israel supporter, but an attack on Iran would be truly disasterous at the moment.

          Comment


          • #50
            I would respond about the polls (you're off the mark by about a decimal order of magnitude) however I don't want to turn this into an election thread.

            In response to Oerdin, Israel may need the United States but there are two things to take home from this:

            1) Israel likely no longer believes it can trust this administration
            2) Israel knows that the US Congress is and for the foreseeable future always will be staunchly and bipartisanly pro-Israel.

            We hold a lot of the cards collectively but Barack Obama does not courtesy this being a democracy.

            Also I would like to point out, to reassure kentonio, that I do not believe being opposed to an Israeli strike on Iran makes anyone anti-Israel, or for that matter anti-Semitic, though there are people who hold that view because they are anti-Israel or anti-Semitic.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
              That's not trying to keep us out of another war; that's deliberately kicking our allies in the balls. It's a surefire way to find yourself alone and without friends.
              Kicking Israel in the balls
              Being alone and without Israel

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                I would respond about the polls (you're off the mark by about a decimal order of magnitude) however I don't want to turn this into an election thread.
                http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/obam...3/28/id/434162

                Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                Also I would like to point out, to reassure kentonio, that I do not believe being opposed to an Israeli strike on Iran makes anyone anti-Israel, or for that matter anti-Semitic, though there are people who hold that view because they are anti-Israel or anti-Semitic.
                I stressed the point, because as a longtime Israel supporter and certainly not a pacifist, if I thought an Israeli strike could be a replay of Osirak I'd be cheering them on. Its not however, any strike now could be truly disasterous and lead to some terrible consequences. Iran is a complex country and we attack there at our peril.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Reg, you keep calling me Oerdin so I assume you know me from another forum. Which forum was that if I may ask?
                  Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    He lurked here for a while before posting, or at least that's what he said when you asked him the last three times.
                    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                    ){ :|:& };:

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      He joined before your inexplicable name change. Maybe I'll change my name to something that makes no sense and then ask regexcellent why he calls me by something else.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        The US acting in an unally-like manner with the always faithful and trustworthy Israel? The gall of it all!
                        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                        "Capitalism ho!"

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I am most definately pro Israel and also against an Israeli attack. The benefit simply does not justify the cost. War with Iran, while definately winnable with U.S. help, would be a very difficult and destructive proposition. Iran has been doing everything in its power to prepare for a U.S. attach since 1980. Any strike without regime change will make matters worse rather than better. Regime change seems to be off the table in every discussion I have seen. As much as I hate to agree with Obama, his strategy with Iran is the only one unless we want to commit a couple of trillion dollars to bringanother full scale war to the Mideast...and this one would be a much bigger war.
                          "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                            The US acting in an unally-like manner with the always faithful and trustworthy Israel? The gall of it all!
                            i know right. if it keeps doing stuff like that, maybe people will start to suspect that US foreign policy is not made in tel aviv.
                            "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                            "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                              Iran can't close the Strait of Hormuz. If it tried it would have to be prepared to lose its entire navy. Also it would lose all its oil revenue and its economy would free fall.
                              They only need to get 1 mammoth tanker seriously burning and de facto no one can/dares to pass anymore for what... a month or 2 ?
                              "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                                i know right. if it keeps doing stuff like that, maybe people will start to suspect that US foreign policy is not made in tel aviv.
                                Tel Aviv is not Israel's capital...and your reference of a retarded conspiracy theory has earned you an ignore.

                                Originally posted by dannubis
                                They only need to get 1 mammoth tanker seriously burning and de facto no one can/dares to pass anymore for what... a month or 2 ?
                                That includes them.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X