BTW IMHO they should ignore the navy for now, concentrate on the Army (they are a land power after all so Army modernization should be job 1), Air Force should be second in line but will be expensive and take time, with the Navy being last on the list.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Russian Anti-Terror troops deployed to Syria
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by onodera View PostKuzya is a diesel-guzzling piece of junk. For ship-to-ship warfare we need submarines with lots of cruise missiles, Mistrals will help us with patrolling the neighboring coasts.
Comment
-
Gas Turbine conversion I could buy, but I think there would have to be way to much changed to install a reactor plant. Probably easier to just build new if you need nuclear."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostI heard something about Kuznetsov getting a nuclear power plant, or at least a new set of gas turbines to replace her crappy boilers. Russian military doctrine as I understand is to use the surface fleet to support subs, in particular with aircraft carriers and anti-air surface combatants providing air cover against ASW helicopters and maritime patrol planes, which is exactly the place Kuznetsov falls into.Graffiti in a public toilet
Do not require skill or wit
Among the **** we all are poets
Among the poets we are ****.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinner View PostSure, they need to modernize their equipment and changing the force structure to a professionalized volunteer force from a conscript force would improve things
Originally posted by Dinner View Post..but they have plenty of time to achieve that before there are any major threats. There is literally nothing on the horizon to threaten them in any way.
Originally posted by Dinner View PostBTW IMHO they should ignore the navy for now, concentrate on the Army (they are a land power after all so Army modernization should be job 1), Air Force should be second in line but will be expensive and take time, with the Navy being last on the list.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostRussia is probably watching Chinas naval expansion and recent sabre waving over the China Sea and not liking what it sees. If China get too far ahead, then Russian influence in the east is going to weaken substantially.
It is almost as if they realize that they cannot counter the U.S. Navy Pacific fleet on their own and see China as the lesser of two evils......."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
I agree. The only thing that comes to mind is that China is set to become Russia's best energy customer with the new oil pipeline. It begs the question of if Russia;s energy sector is what is really controlling Russia's politics."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostI don't understand that calculation though, in their shoes I'd see the US as easily the lesser of the two evils. Considering the history they have you'd think their worst nightmare would be a Chinese superpower over the border.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostAs I understand the decision to buy Mistrals was made out of experience gained during the war with Georgia.
It'll be interesting to see if a Republican president would put Georgia in NATO. I'd like to see Putin's reaction to that.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by onodera View PostIt's still a very sub-par carrier. I'd stuff it full of SAMs instead, it can't use its planes for force projection anyway. Also, I can't get over the fact that a ship is a she even when it's named after a man.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhat experience? Proof that the Russians could curb stomp the places they formerly occupied with impunity? Yay...
It'll be interesting to see if a Republican president would put Georgia in NATO. I'd like to see Putin's reaction to that."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment