Wow, I guess I was educated stupid
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does .999 repeating equal 1?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostWow, I guess I was educated stupid
I honestly can't tell if Vanguard is trolling or retarded - either way, it's not worth worrying aboutLast edited by loinburger; February 26, 2012, 14:18.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Comment
-
Originally posted by loinburger View PostNope, because 1.0-repeating minus 1 doesn't equal 0, it equals 0.0-repeating
Comment
-
People have already shown Wolfram Alpha (i.e., mathematica) does.
I don't consider mathematica a programming language. It's a software program."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostPeople have already shown Wolfram Alpha (i.e., mathematica) does.
I don't consider mathematica a programming language. It's a software program.
Comment
-
Yes, and if you add up the number of real-world applications that use such languages you'd probably get a list of two or three."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Language != Framework.
And no, as far as I know there's no official one."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Look, since we agree that .999... = 1, we can either:
a.Call the proposition 'Proven'
or
b. We can say that the proposition is 'Defined to be True'
Why should I prefer 'a' (proven) to 'b' (defined) when the proofs provided introduce serious unsolved problems of logicVANGUARD
Comment
Comment