How is the balance between boys and girls maintained?

[Lorizael]

I see. So when you see a building or a car or a computer you assume it was not created by an intelligent being because of the Law of Large Numbers?

Uh, no. When I see a building or a car or a computer I assume there are probably tool users present.

But when I see a large data set (the human population) conforming to expected values (~1:1 sex ratio) I assume it's because of the Law of Large Numbers. You're much more likely to see a skewing of the sex ratio in small data sets. For example, my parents have three children. You would expect there to be 1.5 male children and 1.5 female children, but instead there are 3.0 male children and 0.0 female children, because the Law of Large Numbers does not apply with such a small data set.

[a.kitman]

Courtesy of Loin, http://www.gutenberg.org/files/29614...-h/29614-h.htm

haha, i cant wait for the movie.

[a.kitman]

This thread is a bit like trying to use reasoned and rational points in an argument with a cat.

you wouldnt say that if you had ever planoformed whit one.

[notyoueither]

the Law of Large Numbers of Kid.

Scary thought.

[loinburger]

They'd probably kill each other off without leaving any survivors.

Kidicious #1: I believe that whales are reptiles.
Kidicious #2: Good night!!! Everybody knows whales are birds!!!
Kidicious #1: Why do you hate God???
Kidicious #2: You hypocrite! Why don't you marry reptiles if you love them so much???
Kidicious #3: You call yourselves skeptics when you believe in the existence of whales????? Good night!!!!! Dicks!!!!!

And so on.

[BeBMan]

[rah]

Kidicious #2: You hypocrite! Why don't you marry reptiles if you love them so much???

Shouldn't that one be

You're a hypo rite and a horrinle person in general.

[PLATO]

So beautifully elegant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher%27s_principle

meh...its not that complicated...legs up gets a boy and a$$ up gets a girl. Simple.

[Kidlicious]

Ok, firstly I've been holding back with you for quite a while now because I was trying to be a nice person and not rip into you over your beliefs. I ignored the steady stream of 'YOU SO IGNORANT' you kept throwing out, but I'm bored of trying to be nice now. Like that little **** Ben you're an appalling excuse for a so called Christian, and don't deserve kindness or tolerance from others as you are so clearly incapable of showing it yourself.

Right, now thats out the way..

We is our species, and it doesn't matter a flying **** what 'we' believe, what matters is what we 'know'. I understand that in your crazy ass head just saying something and seeing little flying god monkeys when you fall asleep is enough to MAKE GOD TRUE, but it means literally nothing to me. There is no science supporting god, and if you weren't a complete ****ing idiot you might appreciate that thats probably a good thing in the long run.



The only 'evidence' you have supplied is that you are a total ****ing idiot who doesn't know what the word 'evidence' means. Saying 'Of course it is' isn't evidence, its just you spouting off your badly formulated and increasingly unstable 'thoughts'. Try reading a book sometime, you could start with the Bible.

What I'm trying to do here is explain to you and so many others how very stupid you all are, but you're all to stupid to get it. Only a mouth breathing idiot would only believe things that he can prove. Such a person would belongs in the mental ward. No all of us believe things that we have no proof of, like whether or not mommy and daddy love us. Only a ****** would not believe his mommy and daddy don't love him because he can't proof it. The poor sucker is going to go through life not knowing if ANYONE WILL love him.

Do I know that God exists? No not really, not in the sense that I can prve it. But then I never needed to prove it. Just like I never needed to prove that mommy and daddy love me.

But one of you atheists asked me if there is any evidence (not proof you moron) that God exists. As a christian I'm commanded by God to answer that question. So I did in a manner that is very typical for a christian to do. I knew that this is what most of you asshokles would do though. But that's fine.

[Kidlicious]

Uh, no. When I see a building or a car or a computer I assume there are probably tool users present.

But when I see a large data set (the human population) conforming to expected values (~1:1 sex ratio) I assume it's because of the Law of Large Numbers. You're much more likely to see a skewing of the sex ratio in small data sets. For example, my parents hitave three children. You would expect there to be 1.5 male children and 1.5 female children, bujt instead there are 3.0 male children and 0.0 female children, because the Law of Large Numbers does not apply with such a small data set.

Oh, I've been done with yhat. Thought you were talking about the existence of God

[giblets]

I think Kidicious is evidence that a God who loves all humans doesn't exist. I mean why create someone so mean and stupid if you love humanity

[Hauldren Collider]

Grib, god could just be doing the rest of us a favor and providing us with delightful entertainment. This thread = x 1000

[Kidlicious]

Here's a fun resource. Consider it "evidence" from my side, if you will:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies#Red_herring_fallacies

Specifically, "ad populum," and now "appeal to authority."

EDIT: Oh, and ad hominem, but that pretty much goes without saying at this point.

Good night you are one stupid ****!

I never said it be true that God exists because people say that he does. I simply am trying to make the point that by simply denying the evidence you show yourself to be a complete moron. Most people accept it as evidence. So if you disagree that God exists you had better challenge the evidence or most people are simply going to regard you as an idiot and not listen to you.

[Kidlicious]

So besides multiple strawmen that don't count obviously. Out of all you atheist the only response to the evidence that God exists is THAT'S NOT EVIDENCE. Got it. This thread is done unless one of you can respond intelligently.

See ya all in the next one.

[Provost Harrison]

Is this the "stick your fingers in your ears and sing la la la" method of debating? You've lost every point, post constant fallacies and yet you still think you are on top The ignore list is dangerously close for you.