Tweet
Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
-
Are you ****ing serious?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum -
Yes, why should we start killing people who haven't been convicted of any crimes? I can see why we would need that in some situations, like a war, but if someone can be taken prisoner I don't see why we should just shoot them.Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostComment
-
Yes, and they're bull****. What is a "crime against humanity?" It's basically something so awful we don't have something on the books for it, which is textbook ex post facto.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
Vigilante justice has been around for a long time too.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
gribby
What makes it any better to kill somebody who's been convicted of a crime, you twit?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
They got a trial?Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
So?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
You two both have the morality of children.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
So the thing is here, that by killing Gaddafi, you've now shown what will happen to other leaders like Saleh or Assad if they back down. Instead, they should have given him a happy exile. Now what we have are the leaders of nations fighting for their lives against their people. It doesn't matter how much they deserve to die for their crimes, it isn't worth consigning the innocents who will be slaughtered by scared dictators to their deaths just so we can have our petty revenge.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
They did something that society had already decided beforehand was worthy of the death penalty?Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostComment
-
This is a stupid argument and KH is obviously right.Comment
-
No, he's not. This is like reverse moral hazard.Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
Sorry, I must have missed the part where society decided that it was okay to slaughter thousands for blatant personal gain.Originally posted by gribbler View Post12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
You have no idea what the words you're using even mean.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio RegumComment
-
And you act like a child when people disagree with you.Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
Comment
-
That's not what society decided. Society implicitly decides, by practicing kangaroo courts for "crimes against humanity", that we can invent crimes punishable by death for leaders who have lost favor in a dramatic way. So far we have never seen it applied to people who are not obviously atrocious men, but that is not a guarantor of future responsible use of institutions like the ICC. As an example, all those people who wanted to stick Bush up in the ICC for "war crimes".Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
Comment