Originally posted by DriXnaK
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why does google chrome suck so much?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostI tried Opera briefly, ages and ages ago. Half the screen was obscured by a built-in ad which could only be removed by switching to the pay version. I went back to IE before eventually discovering Firefox. I haven't seen Opera since, but in the spirit of this thread I'm going to assume it's still exactly the same as it was in 2001 or so, and condemn it.<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures</p>
Comment
-
Euros? The devil's money! Death to Opera!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostAlso, those benchmarks [posted by Asher] directly contradict my own measurements. Will post those in a bit when I'm on a computer with both installed.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Out of curiosity, I opened the latest version of all of the major browsers to the same tabs. Opera is pretty close to FF for lowest memory.
For the past few releases, Mozilla has put tons of effort/money/resources into a project called MemShrink which is aggressively culling memory usage. Their results have been pretty awesome.
Firefox 11 will have even better numbers as they cut a ton of extra memory used in the Javascript engine."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
It would make sense that Chrome is using more memory due to the way it sandboxes tabs.
Personally I think it's well worth it, even though I'm on an ancient computer with a pathetic amount of RAM (1GB) by today's standards. So far I've had Firefox 8 crash on me an close all tabs 3 times in a week. (I'm on XP, so maybe they're just forgetting how to make it stable on older OS?)
I've had Chrome crash a some tabs too (I had disabled the swap file on this machine years ago, and was running out of virtual memory until I turned it back on), but then it's only the single tab which has a problem so none of my other stuff is interrupted.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostIt would make sense that Chrome is using more memory due to the way it sandboxes tabs.
I use nightly developer builds of Firefox & weekly developer builds of Chrome. Can't remember the last time either crashed on me, and I use them a lot on both XP and Win7, as well as OS X 10.7. I don't know what you're doing."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostIE9 does the same thing with less memory.
I use nightly developer builds of Firefox & weekly developer builds of Chrome. Can't remember the last time either crashed on me, and I use them a lot on both XP and Win7, as well as OS X 10.7. I don't know what you're doing.
Comment
-
BTW, sandboxed tabs is coming soon to Firefox. It's already enabled by default on the Android version of Firefox."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostBTW, sandboxed tabs is coming soon to Firefox. It's already enabled by default on the Android version of Firefox.
(I don't care about IE9 because even if it was the best browser in the universe I wouldn't use it, because it's clear they're just trying to gain market share until they can screw the internet all over again like they did with IE6.)
Comment
Comment