A Thread on Race and Multiculturalism for Hera

[Elok]

I'm not offended or anything, but taking something flatly rude and adding a couple of smileys does not instantly turn it into a funny joke. Watch:

Your mother is a drunken, venereal disease-infested prostitute.

See? Doesn't work.

[Lorizael]

I loled.

[giblets]

That's a very good point, Elok.

[DaShi]

Elok is right. It's funnier without the smileys.

[Heraclitus]

On point.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/europe/swedens-big-immigration-idea-the-canada-model/article2200151/

Sweden’s big immigration idea: the ‘Canada model’
doug saunders
London— Globe and Mail Update
Published Thursday, Oct. 13, 2011 2:36PM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Oct. 13, 2011 3:19PM EDT


For decades, Canadians have looked to the Swedes for inspiration. There was Ottawa’s campaign to get lumpy 30-year-old Canadians to be as fit as “the 60-year-old Swede.” There are frequent calls to imitate Stockholm’s environmental policies. And, of course, there’s hockey.
More related to this story

But in recent months, the tables have turned. Policy circles in Stockholm have been dominated with talk of adopting “the Canada model.” That, in fact, is the title of a widely discussed new Swedish book titled Kanadamodellen – “The Canada Model,” which urges Sweden’s governments to start making things look more like their Nordic fellow on the other side of the Atlantic.

“We looked at Canada, and we saw that it worked – even though Canadians don’t always say this, from a Swedish perspective we felt that Canada is a model that should be followed,” said Martin Adahl, one of the book’s editors and a fellow with the Stockholm think tank FORES, as he visited London to discuss his ideas with a bemused group of British and Canadian scholars.

Specifically, the book’s editors are part of a growing group of Swedes that wants its government to adopt Canada’s immigration system – including its high numbers, its points-based recruitment scheme and its ethnic networks of support in major cities that help new immigrants find employment.

Its subtitle is, tellingly, “How immigration leads to work,” which explains the obsession with Canada: In Sweden, immigrants – the largest group of whom are refugees – are typically unemployed, marginalized and far poorer than the native-born population. This has led to alarming political tensions over immigration in this formerly very placid nation.

In Canada, by contrast, the employment rate among the foreign-born (about 70 per cent) is higher than that among native-born Canadians, most immigrants are economic (refugees make up a negligibly small slice of Canadian immigration), and the majority of Canadians say they are satisfied both with the ethnic mix and the levels of immigration.

So from the shores of the Baltic, the Great White North looks like an immigration paradise. Mr. Adahl and his colleague Petter Hojem drew upon leading Canadian academics to produce studies and essays for their book – and here, they ran into difficulties.

“It was hard to convince Canadian academics to write about their own country as a positive example,” Mr. Adahl said. “They’re used to writing critically of it, and thinking of its failings, but I had to persuade them to write about Canada as a positive example – it wasn’t easy.”

Canada, Mr. Adahl says, does a couple things that European countries don’t do. First, it grants immediate access to employment, home and business ownership to new immigrants and refugee claimants. Second, it has a network of charities and non-governmental organizations that help settle and employ new arrivals. And third, it has a relatively open labour market, in which employers can easily hire and fire people, which makes it easier for immigrants to enter the work force.

In much of Europe, including Sweden, many full-time jobs are guaranteed for life, which creates a closed, privileged white-skinned elite and an excluded brown-skinned minority who are stuck in informal jobs and unemployment.

What it neglect to emphasise is that Canada's points system is very selective and they don't have that much illegal immigration because they have a giant border fence called the US. Sweden is a part of the EU, it can use Germany and other nice to live places in the union as a buffer, but that's an inferior fence. Sweden is also more crowded than Canada, this has several interesting and complicating effects downstream.

The system could work for Sweden and if they adopt it they will be markedly better off than what they have currently. Arguably if they do it perfectly, this might even work better for them than the Danish model. But in 20 or 30 years time will simply not be able to compete with the quality of life Canada will still be providing its citizens. Then again with the exception of Switzerland, Finland and perhaps Denmark few European countries will.

Canada shows polite IQ elitism combined with multiculturalism and a flexible labour market is a workable model. Not good for Westerners naturally, but better than non-selective "everyone has a right to live here" multiculturalism.

Canada