Remember that big stink caused by ignoramuses about "niggardly"?

[Thoth]

Well, I guess that it's better than shagging canuck females, or more realistic - female canucks don't want to be near male canucks.

If you only knew....


Canadian beaver is the best in the world.

You need to practice - half of my family is swedish

That would explain a great deal.

[BlackCat]

If you only knew....
Canadian beaver is the best in the world.

Bet that's why canuck women are so pissed - you guys busy hunting four legged furs and ignoring your women.

[Hauldren Collider]

BlackCat, save face and shut up.

[Thoth]

Bet that's why canuck women are so pissed - you guys busy hunting four legged furs and ignoring your women.

?? But the best females are on four legs.

Two legs baad. Four legs good.

Big Brother says so.

[Thoth]

BlackCat, save face and shut up.

Quiet in the cheap seats please.

[BlackCat]

BlackCat, save face and shut up.

Well, since Kuci apparently isn't around to beat some sense into you, then please be KH junior and answer that question that KH Sen. don't dare to answer

Edit: dare is probably an exaggreation - more like he can't figure out how to look good by answering it

[KrazyHorse]

Given that you can't even CHOOSE A STATEMENT to defend, your continued posting is an embarrassment to poly. Please stop.

(1) or (2)?

Come on, sweetheart...

[BlackCat]

Given that you can't even CHOOSE A STATEMENT to defend, your continued posting is an embarrassment to poly. Please stop.

Well, not as big an embarrasment as you are - I asked a simple question that you don't want to answer. Just admit your failure and we can continue

[KrazyHorse]

You didn't "ask a simple question", you twit. You asked for an open-ended explanation of a statement (whose semantic meaning is quite clear) when you can't even come to grips with choosing between two clear-cut alternatives as to the meaning of your statement.

Moron.

[KrazyHorse]

(1) or (2)?

Even a monkey can choose when presented with two alternatives...

[Thoth]

#3?

[BlackCat]

You didn't "ask a simple question", you twit. You asked for an open-ended explanation of a statement (whose semantic meaning is quite clear)

Yeah, it's quite clear, and I expected you to tell why it was relevant wich you can't - you have two choices, either invent some crazy story or admit that you were wrong. Please select

[KrazyHorse]

The only way my statement could be construed as irrelevant is if you meant (2). Which means that you yourself were the source of confusion, as you had obviously misunderstood the entire thread to that point.

If there is a meaningful differentiation, this is actually the alternative that makes you the bigger idiot in my mind.

Congratulations, moron.

[KrazyHorse]

Come on sweetheart. You've had ~2 hours to pick. Make a definitive statement as to which type of ****** you want to be:

1) The type of ****** that makes factually incorrect statements
2) The type of ****** who manages to misconstrue the meaning of a word after having been given 20 posts of context to anchor it to

[BlackCat]

Well, that actually means that your argument is worthless - wonder why you stated it and considered it nessecary to add that Edit

Why don't you admit that you were wrong ? All of Poly can see it and you just look more stupid while defending your failure