Health 'reform' that Burdens our Young

[a.kitman]

thus far you should both stfu cus i havent seen any proof in either direction. i would like one tho, did a google search for 10mins but couldnt find anything satisfying.

[Drake Tungsten]

Gee... then what are you pointing to that proves that the boomers were responsible for Obama?

1. Boomers voted for Obama (just like every age-group besides the elderly).

2. Obama is a Boomer himself.

It's funny watching you and Rah try to run away from one of your own.

[Ming]

1. Boomers voted for Obama (just like every age-group besides the elderly).

Yep...
18 - 30 = 66% for Obama
45 - 64 = 50% for Obama

Not even close.

[Drake Tungsten]

Keep spinning.

[a.kitman]

what exactly is he spinning?

[Ming]

He's just making crap up now, because he's wrong. More smoke and mirrors, plus insults. His normal routine when he has lost.

[Drake Tungsten]

How would you know my routine for times when I've lost? You've never beat me.

[Ming]

You've lost too many times. Usually, you just don't realize it. Just like here. You are wrong, plain and simple.
But live in your fantasy world if you wish...

[Drake Tungsten]

How could you possibly beat me? Your entire argumentative strategy is to say something stupid and then keep repeating it until everyone is tired of laughing at you and move on to other things.

[Riesstiu IV]

As an impartial observer, I can safely say Drake won the argument.

[Ming]

Yeah... 50% of the bommers voted for Obama... yet 66% of the youth voted for Obama, giving him the victory... yet you want to give Drake the victory... you are as stupid as he is

[Ming]

How could you possibly beat me? Your entire argumentative strategy is to say something stupid and then keep repeating it until everyone is tired of laughing at you and move on to other things.

Your strategy is to say something wrong, and then when challanged or proven wrong, start throwing around insults and trying to change the discussion while still claiming you are right while ignoring the facts.

Here, it's simple... you continue to ingore the fact that the under 45 crowd gave Obama his entire marging of victory while boomers were split. The under 30 crowd gave him 83% of his margin of victory.
But feel free to think you are right and claim it wasn't the youth that elected him, and live in your own fantasy world.

[ShaneWalter]

I don't think Drake "won" the argument, but that is only because the argument is really unwinnable.

Like Ming said... the 1% difference in the 45-64 age group is probably not statistically significant. Margin of error could account for that. Yet for ming to argue that proves that baby boomers didn't vote for Obama is just stupid.

"Well the data shows that more baby boomers voted for Obama than McCain"
"Yes but you have to consider the difference is within the margin of error, therefore you are wrong and a liar! This proves more baby boomers voted for McCain."

Seriously? In what world does that make sense?

[ShaneWalter]

Your strategy is to say something wrong, and then when challanged or proven wrong, start throwing around insults and trying to change the discussion while still claiming you are right while ignoring the facts.

Here, it's simple... you continue to ingore the fact that the under 45 crowd gave Obama his entire marging of victory while boomers were split. The under 30 crowd gave him 83% of his margin of victory.
But feel free to think you are right and claim it wasn't the youth that elected him, and live in your own fantasy world.

Is it your assertion that if only baby boomers were allowed to vote, McCain would have won?

[OzzyKP]

It is a dumb argument.

Whoever voted him into office, Obama is himself a Boomer, so Boomers get the blame/credit all the same.