Originally posted by Darius871
View Post
If sexual thought enters into the equation, which it virtually always would in a babe thread, then yes the passage couldn't be more clear.
Of course, hence the "supposed" caveat as well as my "[t]he only real question is whether one's personal belief is that the text actually matters" DanS. Any non-Christian, or any half-assed Christian who feels free to discard any straightforward and unambiguous injunctions that seem inconvenient, obviously couldn't care less.
As far as I'm concerned, if I live a good life and still get turned away from the pearly gates over some lousy pearl jam, I guess them's the breaks. But that doesn't mean I'd be intellectually honest to deny that the text bans image-induced masturbation in black and white.
As far as I'm concerned, if I live a good life and still get turned away from the pearly gates over some lousy pearl jam, I guess them's the breaks. But that doesn't mean I'd be intellectually honest to deny that the text bans image-induced masturbation in black and white.
Comment