Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[serious] Off Topic Moderation Input - Part 2

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    Sloww, think of it this way, now my attention in the NFL thread has gone from 99% arguing with Ben to 100% picking with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
    There's no belittle to it. You can go ahead and make disparaging remarks about Texas all that you want. Your opinion about the place has nothing to do with the question.
    It's noteworthy that only Texans and pseudo-Texans have, in recent memory, been responsible for threatening violence against other forum members for for trying to justify said threats. I acknowledge that there are many sane and moral Texans, but you and BK demonstrate that a significant portion of the Texans and pseudo-Texans on this site are not among them.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowwHand
    replied
    There's no belittle to it. You can go ahead and make disparaging remarks about Texas all that you want. Your opinion about the place has nothing to do with the question.

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
    I just can't believe you're so shaken up. It's ridiculous.
    Who said I was shaken up? This is just your feeble attempt to belittle somebody who reported your horrible friend for breaking a very serious rule. I realize that Texas is the armpit of the wold and that threats of violence are commonplace there, but in the civilized world they're frowned upon.

    Your entire argument consists of "Ben Kenobi should be allowed to break the site rules because Slowwhand is a cretin."

    Leave a comment:


  • Al B. Sure!
    replied
    It's not about the effect on Loinburger. It's about the violation of site rules.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowwHand
    replied
    I just can't believe you're so shaken up. It's ridiculous.

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
    DaShi, Drake and Mobius have stalked me for years, just so you can be aware of what goes on around you.
    Where did they physically threaten you? Provide an example. "Calling Slowwhand stupid" is not equivalent to "threatening to beat up Slowwhand," just FYI.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowwHand
    replied
    DaShi, Drake and Mobius have stalked me for years, just so you can be aware of what goes on around you.

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
    I'm asking a question.
    He could probably find me with Google
    Originally posted by SlowwHand
    If you're going to tell me that he's the only stalker and breaker of rules here though, get ready to be called stupid or a liar.
    Feel free to provide some examples. Ideally, to match Ben's case, the example would have the threats spanning the course of a month or longer.

    Look, I realize that you're biased in favor of Ben because he shares many of your horrible opinions, but that's hardly justification for why he should be allowed to violate the site rules with impunity.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowwHand
    replied
    I'm asking a question. If you're going to tell me that he's the only stalker and breaker of rules here though, get ready to be called stupid or a liar.

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowwHand View Post
    How is he going to find you? Why do you have such a rampaging case of the drizzles?
    "Why do you care that he broke the site rules and the law?" A solid point! Henceforth, site rules should only be enforced if Slowwhand gives his stamp of approval. He is The Decider.

    Do you have any justification for why the site rules shouldn't be enforced in this case other than "with Ben gone, Slowwhand is now the worst poster on Apolyton"?

    Leave a comment:


  • SlowwHand
    replied
    How is he going to find you? Why do you have such a rampaging case of the drizzles?

    Leave a comment:


  • loinburger
    replied
    Originally posted by Nikolai View Post
    IIUC, he threatened some dudes here? Like nobody else ever has done that?
    Nikolai: Moral Relativist Extraordinaire

    And no, while I can't recall anybody else on apolyton making threats, I highly doubt that anybody has repeated their threats multiple times over the course of a month (with the possible exception of Dale, I was absent during that debacle). That's what crosses the line from "being a schmuck online" to "being a dangerously unbalanced schmuck online"
    Last edited by loinburger; October 22, 2011, 13:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaShi
    replied
    It was for more than just threatening someone. NYE is correct, bans should be rare and severe enough to not encourage them.

    As for Sloww, expand your "debating skills" beyond just telling people to shut up and maybe you won't be treated like a ******.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nikolai
    replied
    Sloww

    Whatever happened, six months is a bit excessive. IIUC, he threatened some dudes here? Like nobody else ever has done that? Not that it is okay, but really...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X