I agree. Obviously the scorn for the mocked/excluded poster would only increase more if he would have to come here to beg for the thread to be closed/removed (or PM a mod). I would prefer if the old system of "no threads on posters" was re-established.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
[serious] Off Topic Moderation Input - Part 2
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
"post reported"Winston, on the barricades for freedom of speech
"I don't like laws all over the world. Doesn't mean I am going to do anything but post about it."Jon Miller
-
Next you'll be wanting a ban on posters making fun of people inside threads.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
Cheap.Originally posted by MikeH View PostNext you'll be wanting a ban on posters making fun of people inside threads."post reported"Winston, on the barricades for freedom of speech
"I don't like laws all over the world. Doesn't mean I am going to do anything but post about it."Jon Miller
Comment
-
I want to be clear I don't care if there is a ban on threads or not. (It's pretty much the same thing as insults in threads anyways. At least in a dead forum like this where every post can be read.) I just think it's hypocritical to claim you would protect those who are being mocked if it's hurting them... in a way that could only serve to increase the mockery.
Comment
-
Sorry. Having a bad morning.Originally posted by germanos View PostCheap.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
I don't think there's been anything particularly vicious so far, and certainly not a lot of them. I don't think it's a big deal at the moment.Originally posted by Aeson View PostI want to be clear I don't care if there is a ban on threads or not. (It's pretty much the same thing as insults in threads anyways. At least in a dead forum like this where every post can be read.) I just think it's hypocritical to claim you would protect those who are being mocked if it's hurting them... in a way that could only serve to increase the mockery.Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
Accepted.Originally posted by MikeH View PostSorry. Having a bad morning.
"post reported"Winston, on the barricades for freedom of speech
"I don't like laws all over the world. Doesn't mean I am going to do anything but post about it."Jon Miller
Comment
-
We know you can do moderator stuff now. Provost started a good thread to discuss the merits of boiling moderators down for glue and you closed it.Originally posted by MikeH View PostI don't think there's been anything particularly vicious so far, and certainly not a lot of them. I don't think it's a big deal at the moment.
You would make a most excellent bottle of glue, if I may say so.
Comment
-
That's 'cause I thought it was funny.Originally posted by Braindead View PostWe know you can do moderator stuff now. Provost started a good thread to discuss the merits of boiling moderators down for glue and you closed it.
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
-
I didn't think the thread was funny. I thought closing it was funny.
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
Comment
Comment