Can critical thinking explain why we are here?

[KrazyHorse]

Its a theory that says our universe was preceded by another universe that collapsed to form our big bang (bounce). My spin on it is the bounce began before all the mat'l from the prior universe had joined the "singularity".

Seriously, I have no idea what you think quoting a general science tardification of a paper on loop q.g. has to do with your utterly moronic misunderstanding of what the "expansion" and "contraction" of the Universe actually are.

When you talk it's like random strings of catchphrases. They are utterly sense-free. Talking to you about this is like trying to explain to a parrot why he doesn't actually speak English in any meaningful sense.

Thats nice, but we know you dont behave like that in person

Oh, but I do, whenever I don't manage to steer conversations away from subjects where I know somebody's going to make himself look like an idiot.

or you'd end up with a broken body... The stench of hypocrisy coming from you would repel starving vultures.

What is this, some sort of ***** death threat? Hate to tell you this, but I'm not afraid of insulting people in person. It's been a few years since I got into a fight, though.

I'll never understand why, exactly, people keep lining up on Poly to let me hand their ass to them.

[KrazyHorse]

“The repulsive forces would stop the complete collapse and also turn it around into an expansion,” Bojowald said, effectively preventing temperature and density from approaching infinity."

Thank you. I have no idea what this has to do with anything that I took issue with.

and the mat'l nearby would be consumed while leaving behind variations in the radiation?

WHAT?

I'll check it out

Good luck with that. Soon your random catchphrase generator will have a wealth of new material to work with.

[KrazyHorse]

For those of Poly's non-imbeciles who will awaken soon and read the last page or two of this thread: you're welcome. I do my best to bring you spectacles. ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?

[Berzerker]

You didn't answer the question. And it makes perfect sense to me.

a) I have no urge to attempt to educate you. It would be an exercise in futility.

b) It only makes sense to you because you don't actually know anything.

The question was how did you miss my reference to the expanding universe in () I attached to my metaphor.

In layman's terms?

General relativity in layman's terms?

No, why a new universe could not expand into the mat'l of a prior universe.

The word impose means to intrude...

a. to thrust oneself offensively upon others; intrude.

see?

See what, you maroon?

The discussion where this was brought up was one where you claimed that your particular brand of lolbertarianism came about from some simple, self-evident principles. Particularly, that nobody was to be allowed to impose his will on others. If you're going to take the sense of "impose" which carries moral connotations then you've just managed to create a tautology. The fact that I have to explain this in detail demonstrates what a ridiculous person you are.

More after the jump...

And you said people defending themselves from attack are imposing upon their attackers. Now go look at the definition again...

a. to thrust oneself offensively upon others; intrude.

that aint self defense, Chief

[KrazyHorse]

The question was how did you miss my reference to the expanding universe in () I attached to my metaphor.

The answer is: I didn't. I discounted your "metaphor" as ridiculous, as it is.

[EPW]

i r entertained, ty

[Berzerker]

its funny you accuse Slowwhand of some obsession or whatever

[KrazyHorse]

Metaphorically speaking, the universe is like a butterfly. I think that CMB anisotropies are caused by the flaps of its wings.

[KrazyHorse]

No, why a new universe could not expand into the mat'l of a prior universe.

Because UNIVERSES CANNOT OVERLAP IN THE SENSE YOU PROPOSE

[Kuciwalker]

Just shoot him and be done with it.

[Berzerker]

The question was how did you miss my reference to the expanding universe in () I attached to my metaphor.

The answer is: I didn't. I discounted your "metaphor" as ridiculous, as it is.

If you didn't miss it, why not just use my explanation of the metaphor?

[KrazyHorse]

And you said people defending themselves from attack are imposing upon their attackers. Now go look at the definition again...

a. to thrust oneself offensively upon others; intrude.

that aint self defense, Chief

Hey, "Chief": you're a moron. There ARE OTHER SENSES TO THE WORD "INTRUDE". If your moral basis CONTAINS AXIOMS BASED ON WORDS WHICH THEMSELVES CARRY MORAL CONNOTATIONS THEN YOUR SYSTEM IS SELF-REFERENTIAL.

The link I passed to you (merriam webster) carries, as its first sense of "impose"

to establish or apply by authority b : to establish or bring about as if by force

You ****ing imbecile.



I think people shouldn't impose their wills on others. I define "impose" in such a way that it's always bad. Poof. My moral system is unassailable AND sense free.



****ing idiot lolbertarians. I'm beginning to think that there's a common brain injury or birth defect which causes you all to be so autistic in such similar ways.

[KrazyHorse]

Just shoot him and be done with it.

Now, now. I'm just a cat with a new plaything...

[KrazyHorse]

If you didn't miss it, why not just use my explanation of the metaphor?

What explanation? The one which makes no ****ing sense whatsoever?



You ****ing buffoon.

[KrazyHorse]

Seriously, I'm going to have to go soon. Might add this thread as a link in my sig. Almost as good as Kaak and zakudl (who was, it has to be said, successfully trolling me, as Poly's most ingenious DL)