[Serious Thread] Assisted Suicide.

[Drake Tungsten]

Blame NYE. Let me put him on ignore and this madness can end.

[Kuciwalker]

It's about how nye either doesn't know anything about the Holocaust or doesn't read posts before he responds to them.

[KrazyHorse]

Actually, it's wound its way back to something reasonably related.

The question is whether the definition of "murder" has anything to do with the law or not.

[notyoueither]

He posted that source, and you asked "Uhm. Where in there are death camps discussed?" That leaves two conclusions:

1) You didn't know Auschwitz was a death camp.
2) You didn't read his post.

Pick one, please.

3. Get a clue, Kuci.

That article does not discuss the legality of the death camps.

The author says he considers the death camps legal due to the nature of law and the courts under the Nazis. He sees them as an extension.

What do Vietnamese say about Mai Lai?

Please show me the act of the German Parliament titled 'Final Solution.' Please produce a reference to the records of German courts with a similar term.

You can't, because they do not exist! The ****ing Nazis went so far as to dig up bodies to burn them to cover the fact that they were committing crimes, you ****trumpet!

[notyoueither]

Actually, it's wound its way back to something reasonably related.

The question is whether the definition of "murder" has anything to do with the law or not.

Bingo.

[Kuciwalker]

3. Get a clue, Kuci.

That article does not discuss the legality of the death camps.

The author says he considers the death camps legal due to the nature of law and the courts under the Nazis. He sees them as an extension.

Wow, not only do you either know nothing about the Holocaust or not read posts, you blatantly contradict yourself in your own posts!

[KrazyHorse]

Bingo.

Bingo what? Claiming that the difference between "murder" and "killing" is due entirely to legality opens you up to precisely the line of criticism Drake followed.

[notyoueither]

Wow, not only do you either know nothing about the Holocaust or not read posts, you blatantly contradict yourself in your own posts!

Are you an ultra moron?

His opinion does not make fact - FACT

[notyoueither]

Bingo what? Claiming that the difference between "murder" and "killing" is due entirely to legality opens you up to precisely the line of criticism Drake followed.

No, then we go to morality.

And then I ask what is immoral about ending the life of a helpless invalid who desires their own life to end?

Why is it OK for Judy to do herself, but it is not OK for Mr Judy to assist her?

I fail to see the problem, unless someone has some stuck up sense of morality, or is super-selfabsorbed and just could never be bothered with the happiness of others.

[KrazyHorse]

I don't see what that has to do with the fact that you're evading reality by denying that under your definition, many of the killings of the Holocaust were not "murder"

[notyoueither]

Dude! I'm saying they were murder.

[Kuciwalker]

Are you an ultra moron?

His opinion does not make fact - FACT

"the article does not discuss the legality of the death camps"

"the author says he thinks they were legal"

So you can't spot elementary contradictions in your own posts.

[notyoueither]

And I'm saying Germans themselves would have found so under their own laws had they been left to their own devices. Extreme hypothetical, but that is my position.

[Kuciwalker]

Seriously, nye, the easiest way to stop looking like a complete fool is just admit "yeah, I didn't read the post, and I've been trying to make up **** to cover that up ever since", especially since that admission wouldn't affect your argument in the least.

[DaShi]

This doesn't seem to be about thread assisted suicide at all?

JM

It certainly looks like a suicide to me. + :cigar: